journal of organizational behavior review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4569 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of organizational behavior review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of organizational behavior review
Abbreviated Name journal of organizational behavior review
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2015
protective effect of triphala rasayana against paracetamol-induced hepato–renal toxicity in mice
;Dewasya Pratap Singh;Dayanandan Mani
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 181-186
387 views DOI Abstract
2016
safety assessment of withania somnifera extract standardized for withaferin a: acute and sub-acute toxicity study
;Shruti B. Patel;Nirav J. Rao;Lal L. Hingorani
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
360 views DOI Abstract
2015
preparation and characterization of mercury-based traditional herbomineral formulation: shwas kuthar rasa
;Suresh Janadri;A P Mishra;Ranveer Kumar;I Shanmukh;Nagendra Rao;Muralidhar Kharya
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 268-272
350 views DOI Abstract
2017
reliability of self-reported constitutional questionnaires in ayurveda diagnosis
;Corina Dunlap;Douglas Hanes;Charles Elder;Carolyn Nygaard;Heather Zwickey
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 257-262
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Örgütsel Davranış İlişkilerinde Örüntü Tanıma (Pattern Recognition) Desenleri ve Öngörü Yaklaşımları: Bir Deney Tasarımı ve Sonuçları Üzerine Tartışma
Hakkı Okan YELOĞLU;
Vol. 1 , pp. 1--15
327 views Abstract
2017
influence of amalaki rasayana on telomerase activity and telomere length in human blood mononuclear cells
;Kanive P. Guruprasad;Sweta Dash;Marigowda B. Shivakumar;Pavithra R. Shetty;Kothanahalli S. Raghu;Bhanuvalli R. Shamprasad;Vishwanatha Udupi;Raviraj V. Acharya;Prasanna B. Vidya;Jayakrishna Nayak;Anandan E. Mana;Rajesh Moni;Muraleedharan T. Sankaran;Kapaettu Satyamoorthy
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 105-112
311 views DOI Abstract
2012
strychnos nux-vomica seeds: pharmacognostical standardization, extraction, and antidiabetic activity
;Rajesh Bhati;Anupama Singh;Vikas Anand Saharan;Veerma Ram;Anil Bhandari
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 80-84
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Boosting Innovative Work Behavior in Organizations Through Absorptive Capacity
Elif BAYKAL;
Vol. 1 , pp. 16--33
298 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of hepatoprotective potential of erythrina indica leaves against antitubercular drugs induced hepatotoxicity in experimental rats
;Mohd Mujahid;Talib Hussain;Hefazat Hussain Siddiqui;Arshad Hussain
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 7-12
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
Boosting Innovative Work Behavior in Organizations Through Absorptive Capacity
Elif BAYKAL and
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 16-33
296 views Abstract
View All 46 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.