The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1162 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Antimicrob Chemother
Abbreviated Name j antimicrob chemother
ISSN 1460-2091
Aim and Scope
URL http://jac.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (78 total)

2010
Molecular characterization of macrolide- and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from adult patients in Barcelona, Spain (1993-2008)
Ardanuy C;Domenech A;Rolo D;Calatayud L;Tubau F;Ayats J;Martín R;Liñares J;;
Vol. 65 , No. 4 , pp. -
458 views Abstract
1996
A comparative study of two different regimens of sparfloxacin versus doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in men
Phillips I;Dimian C;Barlow D;Moi H;Stolz E;Weidner W;Perea E;;
Vol. 37 Suppl A , pp. -
451 views Abstract
2001
Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem and 11 other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue animal and human bite wound infections
Goldstein EJ;Citron DM;Merriam CV;Warren YA;Tyrrell K;Fernandez H;;
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. -
429 views Abstract
2019
The use of aminoglycosides in animals within the EU: development of resistance in animals and possible impact on human and animal health: a review.
van Duijkeren, Engeline;Schwarz, Christine;Bouchard, Damien;Catry, Boudewijn;Pomba, Constança;Baptiste, Keith Edward;Moreno, Miguel A;Rantala, Merja;Ružauskas, Modestas;Sanders, Pascal;Teale, Christopher;Wester, Astrid L;Ignate, Kristine;Kunsagi, Zoltan;Jukes, Helen;
403 views DOI Abstract
1997
Extended high-level cross-resistance to antipseudomonal antibiotics amongst Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a university hospital
Sofianou D;Tsakris A;Skoura L;Douboyas J;;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. -
377 views Abstract
1998
Science and pragmatism in the treatment and prevention of neutropenic infection
Klastersky J;;
Vol. 41 Suppl D , pp. -
361 views Abstract
1995
National survey of susceptibility to antimicrobials amongst clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Chen HY;Yuan M;Ibrahim-Elmagboul IB;Livermore DM;;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
1998
The changing pattern of infection in neutropenic patients
Oppenheim BA;;
Vol. 41 Suppl D , pp. -
348 views Abstract
2000
Testing for type-specific antibody to herpes simplex virus--implications for clinical practice
Cowan FM;;
Vol. 45 Suppl T3 , pp. -
345 views Abstract
2002
Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter in the UK, and in vitro evaluation of tigecycline (GAR-936)
Henwood CJ;Gatward T;Warner M;James D;Stockdale MW;Spence RP;Towner KJ;Livermore DM;Woodford N;;
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. -
343 views Abstract
View All 78 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.