Indexed in Journament

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

ISSN 1460-2091· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9/100
Journament Score
#7,685
Journament Rank
81
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name J Antimicrob Chemother
Abbreviated Name j antimicrob chemother
ISSN 1460-2091
URL http://jac.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (81)

2010
Molecular characterization of macrolide- and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from adult patients in Barcelona, Spain (1993-2008)
Vol. 65 , No. 4 , pp. -
494 views Abstract
1996
A comparative study of two different regimens of sparfloxacin versus doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in men
Vol. 37 Suppl A , pp. -
470 views Abstract
2019
The use of aminoglycosides in animals within the EU: development of resistance in animals and possible impact on human and animal health: a review.
427 views DOI Abstract
1997
1998
Science and pragmatism in the treatment and prevention of neutropenic infection
Vol. 41 Suppl D , pp. -
387 views Abstract
1995
National survey of susceptibility to antimicrobials amongst clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. -
382 views Abstract
2006
Multicentre surveillance of the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of macrolide resistance among pharyngeal isolates of group A streptococci in the USA
Vol. 57 , No. 6 , pp. -
377 views Abstract
1998
The changing pattern of infection in neutropenic patients
Vol. 41 Suppl D , pp. -
371 views Abstract
2002
Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter in the UK, and in vitro evaluation of tigecycline (GAR-936)
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. -
366 views Abstract
2026
Improved molecular detection of ceftriaxone resistance in <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> in a reference laboratory setting
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
β-lactam susceptibility testing of ampicillin-susceptible non- <i>faecalis</i> enterococcal clinical isolates in France
2 views DOI Abstract
2022
Individual target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic attainment rates among meropenem-treated patients admitted to the ICU with hospital-acquired pneumonia.
Vol. 77 , No. 11 , pp. 2956-2959
38 views DOI Abstract
2020
ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes
3 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lopinavir pharmacokinetics in COVID-19 patients.
290 views DOI
2020
Rilpivirine in HIV-1-positive women initiating pregnancy: to switch or not to switch?
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of phenotypic and WGS-derived antimicrobial resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from cases of diarrhoeal disease in England and Wales, 2015-16.
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel monobactam LYS228 in a neutropenic murine thigh model of infection.
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. 108-116
34 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
65
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.