open access macedonian journal of medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2406 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

open access macedonian journal of medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name open access maced j med sci
Abbreviated Name open access macedonian journal of medical sciences
ISSN 1857-9655
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (109 total)

2019
DOACs vs Vitamin K Antagonists: a Comparison of Phase III Clinical Trials and a Prescriber Support Tool
Pirlog, Alina-Maria;Pirlog, Cristian Daniel;Maghiar, Marius Adrian;
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. -
564 views Abstract
2014
Hyperleptinemia May Protect From Cardio-Vascular Complications: A Small Georgian Study
Zerekidze, Tamar;Janjgava, Shota;Asatiani, Ketevan;Giorgadze, Elene;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 595-600
537 views Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of the Elderly Caring Model as an Intervention to Prevent the Neglect of the Elderly in the Family.
Ezalina, Ezalina;Machmud, Rizanda;Effendi, Nusyrwan;Maputra, Yantri;
Vol. 7 , No. 14 , pp. 2365-2370
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gambir Extract () Decreases Inflammatory Response and Increases Gastric Mucosal Integrity in Wistar Rats - Model Gastritis.
Oswari, Liniyati;Hidayat, Rachmat;Fatmawati, Fatmawati;Hayati, Lusia;Alisa, Bella Safira;
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3149-3152
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epidemiology of Vehicle Fire Fatalities of Road Traffic Injuries in Kerman Province, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Khodadadizadeh, Ali;Jahangiri, Katayoun;Khorasani-Zavareh, Davoud;Vazirinejad, Reza;
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. 2036-2043
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
The PI3KCA and AKT Inhibitory Activities of Lour. Fruits and Heartwoods Towards Hela Cells.
Dalimunthe, Aminah;Hasibuan, Poppy Anjelisa Zaitun;Satria, Denny;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 1422-1424
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regional Policy for Disaster Risk Management in Developing Countries Within the Sendai Framework: A Systematic Review.
Surianto, Surianto;Alim, Syahirul;Nindrea, Ricvan Dana;Trisnantoro, Laksono;
Vol. 7 , No. 13 , pp. 2213-2219
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Activity of Hydrolyzed Virgin Coconut Oil to Increase Proliferation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression towards on NIH 3T3 Cell Line in Wound Healing Process.
Silalahi, Jansen;Yuandani, Yuandani;Meliala, Dian Ika Perbina Br;Margata, Linda;Satria, Denny;
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3164-3168
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation and Evaluation of Sunflower Oil Nanoemulsion as a Sunscreen.
Arianto, Anayanti;Cindy, Cindy;
Vol. 7 , No. 22 , pp. 3757-3761
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cyclin D1, Caspase 9 and P53 Expressions in T47D Cell Lines after Treatment of , (Lour.) Spreng. Leaves Ethanolic Extract Nanoparticles.
Hasibuan, Poppy Anjelisa Zaitun;Sumaiyah, Sumaiyah;
Vol. 7 , No. 22 , pp. 3786-3789
323 views DOI Abstract
View All 109 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.