Indexed in Journament

open access macedonian journal of medical sciences

ISSN 1857-9655· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,732 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
109 Articles
Scores higher than 49.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name open access maced j med sci
Abbreviated Name open access macedonian journal of medical sciences
ISSN 1857-9655

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 13.6
Content Distribution 47.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for open access macedonian journal of medical sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 13.6 7.8
Content Distribution 47.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (109)

2019
DOACs vs Vitamin K Antagonists: a Comparison of Phase III Clinical Trials and a Prescriber Support Tool
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. -
601 views Abstract
2014
Hyperleptinemia May Protect From Cardio-Vascular Complications: A Small Georgian Study
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 595-600
571 views Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of the Elderly Caring Model as an Intervention to Prevent the Neglect of the Elderly in the Family.
Vol. 7 , No. 14 , pp. 2365-2370
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gambir Extract () Decreases Inflammatory Response and Increases Gastric Mucosal Integrity in Wistar Rats - Model Gastritis.
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3149-3152
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
The PI3KCA and AKT Inhibitory Activities of Lour. Fruits and Heartwoods Towards Hela Cells.
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 1422-1424
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epidemiology of Vehicle Fire Fatalities of Road Traffic Injuries in Kerman Province, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. 2036-2043
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Activity of Hydrolyzed Virgin Coconut Oil to Increase Proliferation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression towards on NIH 3T3 Cell Line in Wound Healing Process.
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3164-3168
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regional Policy for Disaster Risk Management in Developing Countries Within the Sendai Framework: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 7 , No. 13 , pp. 2213-2219
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Cyclin D1, Caspase 9 and P53 Expressions in T47D Cell Lines after Treatment of , (Lour.) Spreng. Leaves Ethanolic Extract Nanoparticles.
Vol. 7 , No. 22 , pp. 3786-3789
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Probiotic Bacterium Isolated from Bekasam (Traditional Fermented Food), . Induces Activation of Gut Mucosal Immune System in Rat.
Vol. 7 , No. 21 , pp. 3530-3533
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence, Profile, and Response to Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Egyptian Physiotherapists
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. -
302 views Abstract
2019
Preparation and Evaluation of Sunflower Oil Nanoemulsion as a Sunscreen.
Vol. 7 , No. 22 , pp. 3757-3761
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cyclin D1, Caspase 9 and P53 Expressions in T47D Cell Lines after Treatment of , (Lour.) Spreng. Leaves Ethanolic Extract Nanoparticles.
Vol. 7 , No. 22 , pp. 3786-3789
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gambir Extract () Decreases Inflammatory Response and Increases Gastric Mucosal Integrity in Wistar Rats - Model Gastritis.
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3149-3152
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Activity of Hydrolyzed Virgin Coconut Oil to Increase Proliferation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression towards on NIH 3T3 Cell Line in Wound Healing Process.
Vol. 7 , No. 19 , pp. 3164-3168
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
The PI3KCA and AKT Inhibitory Activities of Lour. Fruits and Heartwoods Towards Hela Cells.
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 1422-1424
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of the Elderly Caring Model as an Intervention to Prevent the Neglect of the Elderly in the Family.
Vol. 7 , No. 14 , pp. 2365-2370
417 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,732 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

47.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.