current medical research and opinion | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1739 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 50 minutes ago

current medical research and opinion

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name curr med res opin
Abbreviated Name curr med res opin
ISSN 1473-4877
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/icmo
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2008
An international survey of sleeping problems in the general population
Léger D;Poursain B;Neubauer D;Uchiyama M;;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. -
441 views Abstract
2004
Drug costs and bacterial susceptibility after implementing a single-fluoroquinolone use policy at a university hospital
Rapp RP;Evans ME;Martin C;Ofotokum I;Empey KL;Armitstead JA;;
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. -
367 views Abstract
2019
Impact of methodological choices on a meta-analysis of real-world evidence comparing non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Briere, Jean-Baptiste;Wu, Olivia;Bowrin, Kevin;Millier, Aurélie;Toumi, Mondher;Taieb, Vanessa;Levy, Pierre;Coleman, Craig I;
, pp. 1-6
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature.
DeTora, Lisa M;Carey, Michelle A;Toroser, Dikran;Baum, Ellen Z;
, pp. 1-9
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing bleeding rates, related clinical impact and factor utilization in German hemophilia B patients treated with extended half-life rIX-FP compared to prior drug therapy.
Oldenburg, Johannes;Yan, Songkai;Maro, Geraldine;Krishnarajah, Girishanthy;Tiede, Andreas;
, pp. 1
303 views DOI Abstract
2017
pelabuhan indonesia sebagai penyumbang devisa negara dalam perspektif hukum bisnis
;elfrida gultom
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 419-444
303 views DOI Abstract
2015
potensi konflik pemerintah aceh dan pusat dalam bidang pertanahan
;Ria Fitri
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 245-275
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a classifier to identify patients with probable Lennox–Gastaut syndrome in health insurance claims databases via random forest methodology
Vekeman, F.
Vol. 35 , pp. 1415-1420
292 views DOI
2019
Risk assessment of post-discharge mortality among recently hospitalized Medicare heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
Stampehl, Mark;Friedman, Howard S;Navaratnam, Prakash;Russo, Patricia;Park, Siyeon;Obi, Engels N;
, pp. 1
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modulation of sensitization processes in the management of pain and the importance of descending pathways: a role for tapentadol?
Caraci, Filippo;Coluzzi, Flaminia;Marinangeli, Franco;Mercadante, Sebastiano;Rinonapoli, Giuseppe;Romualdi, Patrizia;Nicora, Mariaflavia;Dickenson, Anthony H;
, pp. 1
286 views DOI Abstract
View All 38 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.