Indexed in Journament

current medical research and opinion

ISSN 1473-4877· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,198 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 78.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name curr med res opin
Abbreviated Name curr med res opin
ISSN 1473-4877
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/icmo

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for current medical research and opinion
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 66.7 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 52.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2008
An international survey of sleeping problems in the general population
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. -
495 views Abstract
2004
Drug costs and bacterial susceptibility after implementing a single-fluoroquinolone use policy at a university hospital
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. -
420 views Abstract
2019
Impact of methodological choices on a meta-analysis of real-world evidence comparing non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
, pp. 1-6
393 views DOI Abstract
2017
pelabuhan indonesia sebagai penyumbang devisa negara dalam perspektif hukum bisnis
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 419-444
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature.
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2015
potensi konflik pemerintah aceh dan pusat dalam bidang pertanahan
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 245-275
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing bleeding rates, related clinical impact and factor utilization in German hemophilia B patients treated with extended half-life rIX-FP compared to prior drug therapy.
, pp. 1
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modulation of sensitization processes in the management of pain and the importance of descending pathways: a role for tapentadol?
, pp. 1
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Risk assessment of post-discharge mortality among recently hospitalized Medicare heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
, pp. 1
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Palbociclib and beyond for the treatment of HR + HER2- metastatic breast cancer: An Asian-Pacific perspective and practical management guide on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors.
, pp. 1
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modulation of sensitization processes in the management of pain and the importance of descending pathways: a role for tapentadol?
, pp. 1
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature.
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing bleeding rates, related clinical impact and factor utilization in German hemophilia B patients treated with extended half-life rIX-FP compared to prior drug therapy.
, pp. 1
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Risk assessment of post-discharge mortality among recently hospitalized Medicare heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
, pp. 1
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of methodological choices on a meta-analysis of real-world evidence comparing non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
, pp. 1-6
393 views DOI Abstract
2017
budaya hukum dokter gigi dalam pelimpahan wewenang dan konsekuensi hukumnya
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 399-417
217 views DOI Abstract
2017
implikasi yuridis tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan batubara dalam peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat aceh barat
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 175-191
260 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,198 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.