Indexed in Journament

aaps pharmscitech

ISSN 1530-9932· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,002 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
79 Articles
Scores higher than 79.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

AAPS PharmSciTech (ISSN: 1530-9932) is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed. We invite submissions under the following article types: Original Research Articles Reviews and Mini-reviews White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials Meeting Reports Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications Regulatory Notes Tutorials Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences
Short Name aaps pharmscitech
Abbreviated Name aaps pharmscitech
ISSN 1530-9932
URL https://www.aaps.org/education-and-research/journals/aaps-pharmscitech

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 54.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 11.4 7.8
Content Distribution 50.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2019
QbD-Based Development of Cationic Self-nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems of Paclitaxel with Improved Biopharmaceutical Attributes.
Beg, Sarwar;Kaur, Ravinder;Khurana, Rajneet Kaur;Rana, Vikas;Sharma, Teenu;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 118
554 views DOI Abstract
2020
Stimuli Responsive In Situ Gelling Systems Loaded with PLGA Nanoparticles of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride for Effective Treatment of Periodontitis.
Beg, Sarwar;Dhiman, Shashi;Sharma, Teenu;Jain, Ashish;Sharma, Rakesh Kumar;Jain, Atul;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 76
489 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chitosan-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Optimization of Photodynamic Therapy: a Review.
Calixto, Giovana Maria Fioramonti;de Annunzio, Sarah Raquel;Victorelli, Francesca Damiani;Frade, Maria Lucia;Ferreira, Paula Scanavez;Chorilli, Marlus;Fontana, Carla Raquel;
Vol. 20 , No. 7 , pp. 253
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combination of Colloidal Silicon Dioxide with Spray-Dried Solid Dispersion to Facilitate Discharge from an Agitated Dryer.
Lee, Yung-Chi;McNevin, Michael;Ikeda, Craig;Chouzouri, Georgia;Moser, Justin;Harris, David;Howell, Logan;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 182
432 views DOI Abstract
2013
imaging comparison between 18f-fdg-pet/ct and 18f-flouroethyl choline pet/ct in rare case of thymus carcinoma exhibiting a positive choline uptake
;Mustafa Takesh;Stefan Adams
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanosized Transferosome-Based Intranasal In Situ Gel for Brain Targeting of Resveratrol: Formulation, Optimization, In Vitro Evaluation, and In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study.
Salem, Heba F;Kharshoum, Rasha M;Abou-Taleb, Heba A;Naguib, Demiana M;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 181
430 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of Orodispersible Films Containing Benzydamine Hydrochloride Using a Modified Solvent Casting Method.
Pechová, Veronika;Gajdziok, Jan;Muselík, Jan;Vetchý, David;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 2509-2518
422 views DOI Abstract
2018
Impact of Porous Excipients on the Manufacturability and Product Performance of Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.
Beringhs, André O'Reilly;Minatovicz, Bruna Cristina;Zhang, Geoff G Z;Chaudhuri, Bodhisattwa;Lu, Xiuling;
Vol. 19 , No. 7 , pp. 3298-3310
415 views DOI Abstract
2018
successful use of a multidisciplinary approach to treat a perforated duodenal malignant lymphoma in an elderly patient
;Tomoko Takagishi;Yuta Niimi;Goshi Matsuki;Shinta Nagano;Junsuke Hinami;Masaaki Kajiwara;Kiyoshi Kaneko;Yoshihiro Kubota;Osamu Nakai
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality by Design Enabled Development of Oral Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of a Novel Calcimimetic Cinacalcet HCl Using a Porous Carrier: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterisation.
Panigrahi, Kahnu Charan;Patra, Ch Niranjan;Rao, M E Bhanoji;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 216
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimization of Thymoquinone-Loaded Coconut Oil Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for the Management of Ethanol-Induced Ulcer.
Fahmy, Usama A;L Alaofi, Ahmed;Awan, Zuhier A;Alqarni, Hani M;Alhakamy, Nabil A;
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 137
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cold Flow Evaluation in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems by Measuring the Width of the Oozed Adhesive.
Miyazaki, Tamaki;Kanno, Hitomi;Yamamoto, Eiichi;Ando, Daisuke;Izutsu, Ken-Ich;Goda, Yukihiro;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 120
302 views DOI Abstract
2020
Stimuli Responsive In Situ Gelling Systems Loaded with PLGA Nanoparticles of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride for Effective Treatment of Periodontitis.
Beg, Sarwar;Dhiman, Shashi;Sharma, Teenu;Jain, Ashish;Sharma, Rakesh Kumar;Jain, Atul;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 76
489 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mechanistic Insights of Formulation Approaches for the Treatment of Nail Infection: Conventional and Novel Drug Delivery Approaches.
Vikas, Agrawal;Rashmin, Patel;Mrunali, Patel;Chavan, Rahul B;Kaushik, Thanki;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 67
262 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Significance of Utilizing In Vitro Transfer Model and Media Selection to Study the Dissolution Performance of Weak Ionizable Bases: Investigation Using Saquinavir as a Model Drug.
Chegireddy, Mohith;Hanegave, Geeta K;Lakshman, Dani;Urazov, Aman;Sree, K Navya;Lewis, Shaila A;Dengale, Swapnil J;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 47
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethambutol-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles as Dry Powder Inhalable Formulation for Tuberculosis Therapy
Nemati, E.
Vol. 20 , pp. 0-0
219 views DOI
2019
Application of the SeDeM Expert System in Studies for Direct Compression Suitability on Mixture of Rhodiola Extract and an Excipient.
Wan, Shulin;Yang, Rui;Zhang, Han;Li, Xuelian;Gu, Mingxian;Guan, Tianbing;Ren, Jianbing;Sun, Huimin;Dai, Chuanyun;
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 105
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preformulation and Evaluation of Tofacitinib as a Therapeutic Treatment for Asthma.
Younis, Usir S;Vallorz, Ernest;Addison, Kenneth J;Ledford, Julie G;Myrdal, Paul B;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 167
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combination of Colloidal Silicon Dioxide with Spray-Dried Solid Dispersion to Facilitate Discharge from an Agitated Dryer.
Lee, Yung-Chi;McNevin, Michael;Ikeda, Craig;Chouzouri, Georgia;Moser, Justin;Harris, David;Howell, Logan;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 182
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
QbD-Based Development of Cationic Self-nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems of Paclitaxel with Improved Biopharmaceutical Attributes.
Beg, Sarwar;Kaur, Ravinder;Khurana, Rajneet Kaur;Rana, Vikas;Sharma, Teenu;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 118
554 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,002 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

54.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.