journal of veterinary medical research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2883 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of veterinary medical research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of veterinary medical research
Abbreviated Name journal of veterinary medical research
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (98 total)

2010
estrutura de espécies arbóreas sob efeito de borda em um fragmento de floresta estacional semidecidual em pernambuco edge effect on the structure of tree species in a seasonal forest fragment in pernambuco
;Alan Caue de Holanda;Ana Lícia Patriota Feliciano;Luiz Carlos Marangon;Moisés Silva dos Santos;Cybelle Laís Souto Maior Sales de Melo;Mayara Maria de Lima Pessoa
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 103-114
403 views DOI Abstract
2006
trocas gasosas de cafeeiros (coffea arabica l.) e seringueiras (hevea brasiliensis muell. arg.) em diferentes sistemas de cultivo na região de larvas, mg gas exchange in coffe (coffea arabica l.) and rubber tree (hevea brasiliensis muell. arg.) in different crop systems in lavras, mg
;Cláudio Roberto Meira de Oliveira;João Paulo Rodrigues Alves Delfino Barbosa;Angela Maria Soares;Luiz Edson Mota de Oliveira;Renato Luiz Grisi Macedo
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 197-206
373 views DOI Abstract
2016
modeling and simulation of relief influence on eucalyptus forests: interaction between solar irradiance and productivity
;Yhasmin Paiva Rody;Aristides Ribeiro;Aline Santana de Oliveira;Fernando Palha Leite
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 319-327
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
influence of coconut shell addition on physico-mechanical properties of wood plastic composites1
;Éverton Hillig;Ignacio Bobadilla;Ademir José Zattera;Érick Agonso Agnes de Lima;Raquel Marchesan
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. -
337 views DOI Abstract
2014
extractives and energetic properties of wood and charcoal
;Antônio José Vinha Zanuncio;Amélia Guimarães Carvalho;Paulo Fernando Trugilho;Thiago Campos Monteiro
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 369-374
313 views DOI Abstract
a proposed methodology for the correction of the leaf area index measured with a ceptometer for pinus and eucalyptus forests
;Domingos Mendes Lopes;Nigel Walford;Helder Viana;Carlos Roberto Sette Junior
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 845-854
307 views DOI Abstract
2006
desempenho silvicultural de clones de eucalyptus grandis em relação às árvores matrizes silvicultural performance of eucalyptus grandis clones compared with donor trees
;Glêison Augusto dos Santos;Aloisio Xavier;Hélio Garcia Leite
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 737-747
303 views DOI Abstract
2010
análise discriminante de solos sob diferentes usos em área de mata atlântica a partir de atributos da matéria orgânica discriminant analysis of soils under different land uses in the atlantic rain forest area using organic matter attributes
;Vinicius de Melo Benites;Rondinele de Oliveira Moutta;Heitor Luiz da Costa Coutinho;Fabiano de Carvalho Balieiro
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 685-690
292 views DOI Abstract
2007
modificações na produtividade e nas características físicas e químicas da madeira de eucalyptus grandis causadas pela adubação com lodo de esgoto tratado changes in productivity and physicochemical characteristics of eucalyptus grandis wood caused by sewage sludge application
;Ricardo Marques Barreiros;José Leonardo de Moraes Gonçalves;Cláudio Angeli Sansígolo;Fábio Poggiani
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 103-111
286 views DOI Abstract
2004
eficiência do uso de micronutrientes e sódio em três procedências de acácia-negra (acacia mearnsii de wild.) nutitional efficiency in micronutrients and sodium of three australian provenances of black wattle (acacia mearnsii de wild.)
;Marcos Vinicius Winckler Caldeira;Rubens Marques Rondon Neto;Mauro Valdir Schumacher
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 39-47
272 views DOI Abstract
View All 98 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.