Indexed in Journament

current opinion in food science

ISSN 2214-7993· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,344 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
45 Articles
Scores higher than 78.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name current opinion in food science
Abbreviated Name current opinion in food science
ISSN 2214-7993
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-food-science

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for current opinion in food science
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 38.9 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 77.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (45)

2006
revisão da artroplastia total de joelho em dois tempos: o valor da cultura obtida por biópsia artroscópica review of knee total arthroplasty in two steps: the value of culture obtained through arthroscopic biopsy
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 226-228
423 views DOI Abstract
2009
propriedades mecânicas do gastrocnêmio eletroestimulado pós-imobilização mechanical properties of gastrocnemius eletrostimulated after immobilization
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 269-272
411 views DOI Abstract
2009
influência da irradiação do laser na regeneração nervosa em diferentes locais de tratamento influence of laser radiation in nerve regeneration in different treatment sites
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 331-335
376 views DOI Abstract
2012
estudo da reprodutibilidade e compreensão da classificação de judet e letournel comprehension and reproducibility of the judet and letournel classification
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 70-74
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel technologies to improve food safety and quality
Vol. 30 , pp. 1-7
355 views DOI
2011
2011
estudo da força de tração utilizando parafuso excêntrico em placa de compressão dinâmica larga (dcp-l) study of traction force using eccentric screw in large dynamic compression plate (dcp-l)
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 145-148
337 views DOI Abstract
2009
tratamento cirúrgico da fratura toracolombar surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 9-12
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mycotoxin contamination in cereal-based baby foods
Vol. 30 , pp. 73-78
216 views DOI
2019
Novel technologies to improve food safety and quality
Vol. 30 , pp. 1-7
355 views DOI
2018
Editorial overview: Food mycology
Vol. 23 , pp. vi-vii
257 views DOI
2017
Editorial overview: Food toxicology
Vol. 18 , pp. 1-
206 views DOI
2013
graduação radiográfica da cimentação de hastes femorais na artroplastia do quadril radiographic grading of femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 30-33
240 views Abstract
2012
espondilolistese traumática do áxis: epidemiologia, conduta e evolução traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: epidemiology, management and outcome
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 84-87
125 views DOI Abstract
2012
treinamento em pesquisa global em cirurgia ortopédica: semente para uma rede internacional global research coaching in orthopedic surgery: seeding for an international network
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 110-117
291 views DOI Abstract
2012
estudo da reprodutibilidade e compreensão da classificação de judet e letournel comprehension and reproducibility of the judet and letournel classification
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 70-74
372 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,344 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.