current opinion in food science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#481 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

current opinion in food science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name current opinion in food science
Abbreviated Name current opinion in food science
ISSN 2214-7993
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-food-science
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (45 total)

2007
quedas em idosos institucionalizados: características gerais, fatores determinantes e relações com a força de preensão manual falls in institutionalized elderly people: general characteristics, determinant factors and relationship with handgrip strength
;José Rubens Rebelatto;Alessandra Paiva de Castro;Aline Chan
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 151-154
390 views DOI Abstract
2009
propriedades mecânicas do gastrocnêmio eletroestimulado pós-imobilização mechanical properties of gastrocnemius eletrostimulated after immobilization
;Leonardo César Carvalho;Juliana Cristina Polizello;Natalia Padula;Fernando Cassiolato Freitas;Antonio Carlos Shimano;Ana Claudia Mattiello-Sverzut
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 269-272
359 views DOI Abstract
2006
revisão da artroplastia total de joelho em dois tempos: o valor da cultura obtida por biópsia artroscópica review of knee total arthroplasty in two steps: the value of culture obtained through arthroscopic biopsy
;Marcos de Camargo Leonhardt;Caio Oliveira D'Elia;Alexandre Leme Godoy dos Santos;Ana Lúcia Lei Munhoz de Lima;José Ricardo Pécora;Gilberto Luis Camanho
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 226-228
332 views DOI Abstract
2007
a proposta biomecânica para a avaliação de sobrecarga na coluna lombar: efeito de diferentes variáveis demográficas na fadiga muscular a biomechamical approach for assessment of overload on lumbar spine: the effects of different demographic variables on muscle fatigue
;Fernando Sérgio Silva Barbosa;Mauro Gonçalves
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 132-137
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel technologies to improve food safety and quality
Morales-de la Peña M.
Vol. 30 , pp. 1-7
314 views DOI
2012
estudo da reprodutibilidade e compreensão da classificação de judet e letournel comprehension and reproducibility of the judet and letournel classification
;Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello;Marcus Aurelius Araujo Nunes;Thiago Leonardi Azuaga;Marcelo Cavalheiro de Queiroz;Emerson Kyoshi Honda;Nelson Keiske Ono
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 70-74
306 views DOI Abstract
2009
influência da irradiação do laser na regeneração nervosa em diferentes locais de tratamento influence of laser radiation in nerve regeneration in different treatment sites
;Fausto Fernandes de Almeida Sousa;Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho Andraus;Cláudio Henrique Barbieri;Nilton Mazzer
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 331-335
297 views DOI Abstract
2011
estudo da força de tração utilizando parafuso excêntrico em placa de compressão dinâmica larga (dcp-l) study of traction force using eccentric screw in large dynamic compression plate (dcp-l)
;Paulo Leandro Souza Martins;Leocádio Soares Rebelo da Silva;Onilton Arnaud;Walter Rodrigo Daher;João Luiz de Barros Lima Almeida;Anderson Freitas
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 145-148
282 views DOI Abstract
2011
estudo de publicações em periódicos gerais de artigos sobre ortopedia e aparelho locomotor profile of published papers on orthopedics in general journals
;Olavo Pires de Camargo;Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 110-113
277 views DOI Abstract
2011
tradução e adaptação cultural para a língua portuguesa do questionário scoring of patellofemoral disorders: estudo preliminar translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the scoring of patellofemoral disorders into portuguese: preliminary study
;Victor da Silva Aquino;Sandra Fiumana Martins Falcon;Laura Maria Tomazi Neves;Reynaldo Costa Rodrigues;Francisco Alburquerque Sendín
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 273-279
254 views DOI Abstract
View All 45 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.