Indexed in Journament

medecine et sante tropicales

ISSN 2261-2211· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,103 of 29,297 scored journals (34,025 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 85.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name med sante trop
Abbreviated Name medecine et sante tropicales
ISSN 2261-2211

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 37.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 73.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for medecine et sante tropicales
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 37.0 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 5.7
Content Distribution 73.0 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2007
isquemia e reperfusão de músculo sóleo de ratos sob ação da pentoxifilina ischemia and reperfusion of the soleus muscle of rats with pentoxifylline
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 50-63
451 views DOI Abstract
2007
proteína c reativa e instabilidade clínica na doença obstrutiva de artérias carótidas c-reactive protein and clinical instability in carotid artery obstructive disease
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 124-129
373 views DOI Abstract
2008
influência do turno laboral na formação de edema dos membros inferiores em indivíduos normais influence of working shift on the formation of lower limb edema in normal individuals
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 225-230
368 views DOI Abstract
2010
fatores envolvidos na migração das endopróteses em pacientes submetidos ao tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal factors involved in the migration of endoprosthesis in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 61-71
358 views DOI Abstract
2009
comparação dos fatores de risco para amputações maiores e menores em pacientes diabéticos de um programa de saúde da família comparison of risk factors for major and minor amputation in diabetic patients included in a family health program
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 133-138
345 views DOI Abstract
2012
isquemia crítica em membro inferior em paciente jovem com doença cística de artéria poplítea critical limb ischemia in a young patient with cystic disease of the popliteal artery
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 144-149
325 views DOI Abstract
2007
tratamento endovascular em paciente portador de coarctação da aorta: relato de caso endovascular treatment in a patient with aortic coarctation: case report
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 82-85
324 views DOI Abstract
2007
avaliação da utilização de profilaxia da trombose venosa profunda em um hospital escola evaluation of the use of prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in a teaching hospital
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 344-351
323 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical discussion of the arteria lusoria: a case report
, pp. -
162 views DOI Abstract
2015
avaliação da saturação tecidual de oxigênio durante o sintoma claudicante em pacientes com doença arterial periférica
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 311-318
234 views DOI Abstract
2015
factors associated with diabetic foot amputations
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 37-45
198 views DOI Abstract
2015
case report: rupture of popliteal artery aneurysm
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 189-192
224 views DOI Abstract
2014
microbiological species and antimicrobial resistance profile in patients with diabetic foot infections
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 289-293
126 views DOI Abstract
2014
the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 116-122
233 views DOI Abstract
2013
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,103 of 29,297 scored
(34,025 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.