medecine et sante tropicales | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1369 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

medecine et sante tropicales

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name med sante trop
Abbreviated Name medecine et sante tropicales
ISSN 2261-2211
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2007
isquemia e reperfusão de músculo sóleo de ratos sob ação da pentoxifilina ischemia and reperfusion of the soleus muscle of rats with pentoxifylline
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 50-63
350 views DOI Abstract
2008
influência do turno laboral na formação de edema dos membros inferiores em indivíduos normais influence of working shift on the formation of lower limb edema in normal individuals
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 225-230
294 views DOI Abstract
2010
fatores envolvidos na migração das endopróteses em pacientes submetidos ao tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal factors involved in the migration of endoprosthesis in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 61-71
285 views DOI Abstract
2007
proteína c reativa e instabilidade clínica na doença obstrutiva de artérias carótidas c-reactive protein and clinical instability in carotid artery obstructive disease
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 124-129
280 views DOI Abstract
[2014 ANRS meeting on AIDS. UNAIDS-ANRS Regional workshop in Dakar: Test and Treat].
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 9-12
271 views DOI
2009
comparação dos fatores de risco para amputações maiores e menores em pacientes diabéticos de um programa de saúde da família comparison of risk factors for major and minor amputation in diabetic patients included in a family health program
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 133-138
255 views DOI Abstract
2007
tratamento endovascular em paciente portador de coarctação da aorta: relato de caso endovascular treatment in a patient with aortic coarctation: case report
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 82-85
248 views DOI Abstract
2007
avaliação da utilização de profilaxia da trombose venosa profunda em um hospital escola evaluation of the use of prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in a teaching hospital
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 344-351
239 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.