critical reviews in food science and nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1845 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

critical reviews in food science and nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name crit rev food sci nutr
Abbreviated Name crit rev food sci nutr
ISSN 1549-7852
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/bfsn20/current#.UnwKBJSxO3N
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (151 total)

2019
Recent applications of multivariate data analysis methods in the authentication of rice and the most analyzed parameters: A review
Maione C;Barbosa RM;;
Vol. 59 , No. 12 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2017
Enzymatic browning in avocado (Persea americana) revisited: History, advances, and future perspectives
Toledo L.
Vol. 57 , pp. 3860-3872
400 views DOI
2018
Effect of nuts on energy intake, hunger, and fullness, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Akhlaghi, Masoumeh;Ghobadi, Saeed;Zare, Morteza;Foshati, Sahar;
, pp. 1-10
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Targeting NF-κB signaling pathway in cancer by dietary polyphenols.
Khan, Haroon;Ullah, Hammad;Castilho, Paula Cristina Machado Ferreira;Gomila, Antoni Sureda;D'Onofrio, Grazia;Filosa, Rosanna;Wang, Fang;Nabavi, Seyed Mohammad;Daglia, Maria;Silva, Ana Sanches;Rengasamy, Kannan R R;Ou, Juanying;Zou, Xiaobo;Xiao, Jianbo;Cao, Hui;
, pp. 1-11
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of real-time PCR for tree nut allergen detection in processed foods.
Linacero, Rosario;Sanchiz, Africa;Ballesteros, Isabel;Cuadrado, Carmen;
, pp. 1-17
342 views DOI Abstract
2016
A Review on the Effect of Drying on Antioxidant Potential of Fruits and Vegetables
Kamiloglu, S.
Vol. 56 , pp. S110-S129
333 views DOI
2020
Safety, beneficial and technological properties of enterococci for use in functional food applications - a review.
Graham, Ken;Stack, Helena;Rea, Rosemary;
, pp. 1-26
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recent advances in quality retention of non-frozen fish and fishery products: A review.
Yu, Dawei;Wu, Liying;Regenstein, Joe M;Jiang, Qixing;Yang, Fang;Xu, Yanshun;Xia, Wenshui;
, pp. 1-13
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implications of recent research on microstructure modifications, through heat-related processing and trait alteration to bio-functions, molecular thermal stability and mobility, metabolic characteristics and nutrition in cool-climate cereal grains and other types of seeds with advanced molecular techniques
Ying, Y.
Vol. 59 , pp. 2214-2224
298 views DOI
2020
The relationship between host circadian rhythms and intestinal microbiota: A new cue to improve health by tea polyphenols.
Song, Dan;Yang, Chung S;Zhang, Xin;Wang, Ying;
, pp. 1-10
296 views DOI Abstract
View All 151 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.