nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1130 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name ned tijdschr geneeskd
Abbreviated Name nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
ISSN 1876-8784
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.ntvg.nl
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (47 total)

1993
[Complement deficiencies and meningococcal disease in The Netherlands]
Swart AG;Fijen CA;te Bulte MT;Daha MR;Dankert J;Kuijper EJ;;
Vol. 137 , No. 23 , pp. -
368 views Abstract
2018
[Second opinion abroad; motives and experiences of patients with incurable cancer].
Hillen, Marij A;Smets, Ellen M A;Onderwater, Astrid;van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M;Sommeijer, Dirkje W;
Vol. 162
352 views DOI Abstract
1994
[International and intercultural aspects of pediatrics and adolescent health care].
Schulpen, T W;
Vol. 138 , No. 7 , pp. 367-70
352 views
2012
image theory's counting rule in clinical decision making: does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?
;Melissa Garman;Paul R. Falzer
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 268-281
327 views Abstract
2015
on making the right choice: a meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage
;Mark R. Nieuwenstein;Tjardie Wierenga;Richard D. Morey;Jelte M. Wicherts;Tesse N. Blom;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Hedderik van Rijn
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
321 views Abstract
2019
[To act or not to act? Developments in prenatal and postnatal care for children with spina bifida aperta].
Lutters, Bart T H;Spoor, Jochem K H;de Jong, T H Rob;Kompanje, Erwin J O;Verhagen, A A Eduard;Brouwer, Oebo F;Groen, Rob J M;
Vol. 163
307 views DOI Abstract
2013
the role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration
;Uriel Haran;Ilana Ritov;Barbara A. Mellers
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 188-201
291 views Abstract
2018
Eleventh Safe Sleeping Survey in the Netherlands: Parents' habits concerning infant sleep position and location
Konijnendijk, A.
Vol. 162 , pp. 0-0
281 views
2019
[Care contacts of elderly patients in the emergency care pathway: a retrospective cohort study].
Berben, Sivera A A;Bloemhoff, Anneke;Habets, Karin C F;Liefers, Janine;Hensens, Chantal J M;van Grunsven, Pierre M;Schoon, Yvonne;van den Berg, H A M;
Vol. 163
272 views DOI Abstract
2012
normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting
;Nicole Senecal;Teresa Wang;Elizabeth Thompson;Joseph W. Kable
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 568-589
269 views Abstract
View All 47 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.