Indexed in Journament

nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde

ISSN 1876-8784· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,889 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 66.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ned tijdschr geneeskd
Abbreviated Name nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
ISSN 1876-8784
URL http://www.ntvg.nl

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 71.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.4
Content Distribution 71.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

1993
[Complement deficiencies and meningococcal disease in The Netherlands]
Swart AG;Fijen CA;te Bulte MT;Daha MR;Dankert J;Kuijper EJ;;
Vol. 137 , No. 23 , pp. -
442 views Abstract
2018
[Second opinion abroad; motives and experiences of patients with incurable cancer].
Hillen, Marij A;Smets, Ellen M A;Onderwater, Astrid;van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M;Sommeijer, Dirkje W;
Vol. 162
424 views DOI Abstract
1994
[International and intercultural aspects of pediatrics and adolescent health care].
Schulpen, T W;
Vol. 138 , No. 7 , pp. 367-70
422 views
2012
image theory's counting rule in clinical decision making: does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?
;Melissa Garman;Paul R. Falzer
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 268-281
407 views Abstract
2015
on making the right choice: a meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage
;Mark R. Nieuwenstein;Tjardie Wierenga;Richard D. Morey;Jelte M. Wicherts;Tesse N. Blom;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Hedderik van Rijn
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
391 views Abstract
2019
[To act or not to act? Developments in prenatal and postnatal care for children with spina bifida aperta].
Lutters, Bart T H;Spoor, Jochem K H;de Jong, T H Rob;Kompanje, Erwin J O;Verhagen, A A Eduard;Brouwer, Oebo F;Groen, Rob J M;
Vol. 163
377 views DOI Abstract
2012
normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting
;Nicole Senecal;Teresa Wang;Elizabeth Thompson;Joseph W. Kable
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 568-589
347 views Abstract
2013
the role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration
;Uriel Haran;Ilana Ritov;Barbara A. Mellers
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 188-201
342 views Abstract
2018
Eleventh Safe Sleeping Survey in the Netherlands: Parents' habits concerning infant sleep position and location
Konijnendijk, A.
Vol. 162 , pp. 0-0
333 views
2019
[Care contacts of elderly patients in the emergency care pathway: a retrospective cohort study].
Berben, Sivera A A;Bloemhoff, Anneke;Habets, Karin C F;Liefers, Janine;Hensens, Chantal J M;van Grunsven, Pierre M;Schoon, Yvonne;van den Berg, H A M;
Vol. 163
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Preventing TB among immigrants; aiming for an integrated approach to infectious diseases]
Erkens C;Spruijt I;van den Hof S;;
Vol. 164 , pp. -
275 views Abstract
2020
New on the market? Corona virus outbreak in Wuhan
Haagmans, B.L.
Vol. 164 , pp. 0-0
182 views
2019
The uncomfortable history of Mary Mallon and typhoid fever
Adriani, K.
Vol. 163 , pp. 0-0
253 views
2019
[To act or not to act? Developments in prenatal and postnatal care for children with spina bifida aperta].
Lutters, Bart T H;Spoor, Jochem K H;de Jong, T H Rob;Kompanje, Erwin J O;Verhagen, A A Eduard;Brouwer, Oebo F;Groen, Rob J M;
Vol. 163
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
[How transparent is the new Dutch guideline on cardiovascular risk management?]
Bijl, Dick;
Vol. 163
221 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Influenza point-of-care test in the GP practice and Emergency Department; analytical accuracy and added value].
Verhees, Ruud A F;Lutgens, Suzanne P M;Kusters, Ron;Dinant, Geert-Jan;Cals, Jochen W L;
Vol. 163
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Complexity of disease; a modern view in times of ageing populations and multimorbidity].
Olde Rikkert, Marcel G M;van Zuijlen, Paul P M;de Kleuver, Marinus;van Reekum, Ariëtte;Hoekstra, Alfons G;Sloot, Peter M A;
Vol. 163
275 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Care contacts of elderly patients in the emergency care pathway: a retrospective cohort study].
Berben, Sivera A A;Bloemhoff, Anneke;Habets, Karin C F;Liefers, Janine;Hensens, Chantal J M;van Grunsven, Pierre M;Schoon, Yvonne;van den Berg, H A M;
Vol. 163
323 views DOI Abstract
2018
contamination, association, or social communication: an examination of alternative accounts for contagion effects
;Natalie O. Fedotova;Paul Rozin
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 150-162
205 views Abstract
2018
[Second opinion abroad; motives and experiences of patients with incurable cancer].
Hillen, Marij A;Smets, Ellen M A;Onderwater, Astrid;van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M;Sommeijer, Dirkje W;
Vol. 162
424 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,889 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.