BMJ | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3498 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

BMJ

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name BMJ
Abbreviated Name bmj (clinical research ed)
ISSN 1756-1833
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (224 total)

2015
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; A. Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley Stewart; the PRISMA-P Group
13,031 views DOI
2001
A cognitive behavioural intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections among gay men: randomised trial
Imrie J;Stephenson JM;Cowan FM;Wanigaratne S;Billington AJ;Copas AJ;French L;French PD;Johnson AM; ;;
Vol. 322 , No. 7300 , pp. -
563 views Abstract
1988
Relation between falciparum malaria and HIV seropositivity in Ndola, Zambia
Simooya OO;Mwendapole RM;Siziya S;Fleming AF;;
Vol. 297 , No. 6640 , pp. -
520 views Abstract
2019
Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Haase, Robert;Schlattmann, Peter;Gueret, Pascal;Andreini, Daniele;Pontone, Gianluca;Alkadhi, Hatem;Hausleiter, Jörg;Garcia, Mario J;Leschka, Sebastian;Meijboom, Willem B;Zimmermann, Elke;Gerber, Bernhard;Schoepf, U Joseph;Shabestari, Abbas A;Nørgaard, Bjarne L;Meijs, Matthijs F L;Sato, Akira;Ovrehus, Kristian A;Diederichsen, Axel C P;Jenkins, Shona M M;Knuuti, Juhani;Hamdan, Ashraf;Halvorsen, Bjørn A;Mendoza-Rodriguez, Vladimir;Rochitte, Carlos E;Rixe, Johannes;Wan, Yung Liang;Langer, Christoph;Bettencourt, Nuno;Martuscelli, Eugenio;Ghostine, Said;Buechel, Ronny R;Nikolaou, Konstantin;Mickley, Hans;Yang, Lin;Zhang, Zhaqoi;Chen, Marcus Y;Halon, David A;Rief, Matthias;Sun, Kai;Hirt-Moch, Beatrice;Niinuma, Hiroyuki;Marcus, Roy P;Muraglia, Simone;Jakamy, Réda;Chow, Benjamin J;Kaufmann, Philipp A;Tardif, Jean-Claude;Nomura, Cesar;Kofoed, Klaus F;Laissy, Jean-Pierre;Arbab-Zadeh, Armin;Kitagawa, Kakuya;Laham, Roger;Jinzaki, Masahiro;Hoe, John;Rybicki, Frank J;Scholte, Arthur;Paul, Narinder;Tan, Swee Y;Yoshioka, Kunihiro;Röhle, Robert;Schuetz, Georg M;Schueler, Sabine;Coenen, Maria H;Wieske, Viktoria;Achenbach, Stephan;Budoff, Matthew J;Laule, Michael;Newby, David E;Dewey, Marc;, ;
Vol. 365 , pp. l1945
518 views DOI Abstract
2014
Are "armchair socialists" still sitting? Cross sectional study of political affiliation and physical activity
Bauman A;Gale J;Milton K;;
Vol. 349 , pp. -
497 views Abstract
2005
Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer's disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials
Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna;Zimmermann, Thomas;Beck-Bornholdt, Hans-Peter;van den Bussche, Hendrik
Vol. 331 , No. 7512 , pp. 321-327
426 views
2018
Why we shouldn't use the term "illegal migrant".
Ingleby, David;Bhopal, Raj S;Gruer, Laurence;Krasnik, Allan;Pace, Paola;Petrova-Benedict, Roumyana;
Vol. 363 , pp. k4885
416 views DOI
2020
Military medical response of the French gendarmerie to terrorist events.
Corcostegui, Simon-Pierre;Galant, Julien;Pasquier, Pierre;Kazemzadegan, Kourosh;Saint-Jean, Luc;Commeau, Damien;Boutillier du Retail, Cédric;
Vol. 368 , pp. m803
414 views DOI
2008
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
Guyatt GH;Oxman AD;Kunz R;Jaeschke R;Helfand M;Liberati A;Vist GE;Schünemann HJ; ;;
Vol. 336 , No. 7654 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2019
Association between ambient fine particulate pollution and hospital admissions for cause specific cardiovascular disease: time series study in 184 major Chinese cities.
Tian, Yaohua;Liu, Hui;Wu, Yiqun;Si, Yaqin;Song, Jing;Cao, Yaying;Li, Man;Wu, Yao;Wang, Xiaowen;Chen, Libo;Wei, Chen;Gao, Pei;Hu, Yonghua;
Vol. 367 , pp. l6572
408 views DOI Abstract
View All 224 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.