The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Clicks: 93871
ID: 317450
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
93,871 views
8 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1 of 225 articles by views in BMJ
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 225 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
matthew2021theprismastatementan
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew J. Page; Joanne E. McKenzie; Patrick M. Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy Hoffmann; Cynthia D. Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Elie A. Akl; Sue Brennan |
| Journal | BMJ |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
10.1136/bmj.n71
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.