GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Clicks: 250
ID: 114470
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide
Reference Key
gh2008bmjgrade: Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Guyatt GH;Oxman AD;Vist GE;Kunz R;Falck-Ytter Y;Alonso-Coello P;Schünemann HJ; ;;
Journal BMJ
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436948
Keywords
decision making National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE Health Care pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine gordon h guyatt andrew d oxman grade working group evidence-based medicine / standards practice guidelines as topic / standards* quality indicators pmid:18436948 pmc2335261 doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad consensus

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.