Indexed in Journament

hong kong journal of paediatrics

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,584 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 29.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name hong kong journal of paediatrics
Abbreviated Name hong kong journal of paediatrics
URL https://www.hkjpaed.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 42.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 42.2 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

o estádio estético, interesses e política: um debate entre kierkegaard e rancière
;Lauro Ericksen
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 127-150
527 views DOI Abstract
2009
razão (prática) e natureza na crítica da faculdade do juízo (practical) reason and nature in critique of judgement
;Heiner F. Klemme
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 55-72
312 views DOI Abstract
1999
rir é o próprio do homem to laugh is proper to the man
;Carlos Arthur R. do Nascimento
Vol. 21-22 , No. 1 , pp. 27-32
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
Ethical issue in use of expensive drugs for treatment of rare metabolic diseases in Hong Kong
Yuen, R.
Vol. 23 , pp. 195
288 views
2010
a concepção kantiana da experiência estética: novidades, tensões e equilíbrios kant's conception of aesthetic experience: novelties, tensions and balances
;Leonel Ribeiro dos Santos
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 35-75
268 views DOI Abstract
2013
notas sobre a presença de mead na obra de habermas notes on mead's presence in the work of habermas
;Luciana Aparecida de Araújo Penitente
Vol. 36 , No. spe , pp. 205-220
267 views Abstract
rawls e a justificação da punição
;Denis Coitinho
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. 67-92
259 views DOI Abstract
2004
o bergsonismo de gilles deleuze the bergsonism of giles deleuze
;Sandro Kobol Fornazari
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 31-50
255 views DOI Abstract
1997
diferenças entre as deduções nas duas edições da crítica da razão pura differences between the deductions in the two editions of the critique of pure reason
;Musse Ricardo
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 45-55
254 views DOI Abstract
1999
autoconsciência pura, identidade e existência em kant pure self-conscience, identity and existence in kant
;Clélia Aparecida Martins
Vol. 21-22 , No. 1 , pp. 67-89
245 views DOI Abstract
2018
Ethical issue in use of expensive drugs for treatment of rare metabolic diseases in Hong Kong
Yuen, R.
Vol. 23 , pp. 195
288 views
2015
progresso científico e verdade em popper
;Elizabeth de Assis Dias
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 163-173
107 views DOI Abstract
2013
palavras da editora
;Clélia Aparecida Martins
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 7-7
10 views DOI
2013
a racionalização das tradições na modernidade: o diálogo entre anthony giddens e jürgen habermas the rationalization of traditions in modernity: the dialogue between anthony giddens and jürgen habermas
;Caroline Kraus Luvizotto
Vol. 36 , No. spe , pp. 245-258
180 views Abstract
2013
notas sobre a presença de mead na obra de habermas notes on mead's presence in the work of habermas
;Luciana Aparecida de Araújo Penitente
Vol. 36 , No. spe , pp. 205-220
267 views Abstract
2013
soberania e justiça em rousseau sovereignty and justice in rousseau
;Thomaz Kawauche
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 25-36
242 views Abstract
2013
la transformación de la doctrina de la virtud moral en el pensamiento de juan duns escoto
;Emiliano Javier Cuccia
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 9-22
13 views DOI Abstract
2013
movimento lógico da figura hegeliana do senhor e do servo
;André Oliveira Costa;Agemir Bavaresco
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 37-60
174 views DOI Abstract
2013
novas direções na filosofia da mente
;Gabriel Jucá de Hollanda
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 173-186
12 views DOI Abstract
2013
o homem vazio: uma crítica ao utilitarismo
;Érico Andrade
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 105-122
204 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,584 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.