novas direções na filosofia da mente
Clicks: 26
ID: 151319
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.5
/100
26 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #40 of 49 articles by views in hong kong journal of paediatrics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
As críticas a teorias naturalistas/fisicalistas na filosofia da mente têm focado problemas conceituais fundamentados em qualia e experimentos de pensamento. Cabe questionar a validade de tais críticas, se o alvo das mesmas satisfaz as exigências de uma explicação científica e se as objeções envolvem asserções aparentemente ad hoc. Os filósofos da mente Tyler Burge e Alva Noë, sem fazer uso de tais recursos teóricos, propõem novas maneiras de questionar a neurociência atual. Suas perspectivas chamam atenção pelo foco em problemas empíricos e ainda assim revelam lacunas surpreendentes, no que fisicalistas tendem a considerar a ciência mais avançada da mente.
| Reference Key |
hollanda2013trans/form/aonovas
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gabriel Jucá de Hollanda |
| Journal | hong kong journal of paediatrics |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0101-31732013000300010
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.