Food science & nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#136 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
43
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

Food science & nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Food Sci Nutr
Abbreviated Name food sci nutr
ISSN 2048-7177
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (66 total)

2019
Catechin and caffeine contents in green tea at different harvest periods and their metabolism in miniature swine.
Wakamatsu, Misato;Yamanouchi, Hiroki;Sahara, Hisashi;Iwanaga, Takehiro;Kuroda, Rei;Yamamoto, Ayaka;Minami, Yuji;Sekijima, Mitsuhiro;Yamada, Kazuhiko;Kajiya, Katsuko;
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. 2769-2778
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and multiple linear regression to estimate orange taste.
Mokarram, Marzieh;Amin, Hosein;Khosravi, Mohammad R;
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. 3176-3184
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
Occurrence of aflatoxin in agricultural produce from local markets in Burundi and Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
Udomkun, Patchimaporn;Mutegi, Charity;Wossen, Tesfamicheal;Atehnkeng, Joseph;Nabahungu, Nsharwasi Léon;Njukwe, Emmanuel;Vanlauwe, Bernard;Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit;
Vol. 6 , No. 8 , pp. 2227-2238
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Polyphenols extract from lotus seedpod ( Gaertn.): Phenolic compositions, antioxidant, and antiproliferative activities.
Shen, Yingbin;Guan, Yifu;Song, Xun;He, Jialiang;Xie, Zhenxing;Zhang, Youwei;Zhang, Hui;Tang, Dan;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 3062-3070
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physicochemical and hydration properties of different cereal and legume gluten-free powders.
Boucheham, Nohed;Galet, Laurence;Patry, Séverine;Zidoune, Mohammed Nasreddin;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 3081-3092
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improvement of gluten-free bread and cake properties using natural hydrocolloids: A review.
Salehi, Fakhreddin;
Vol. 7 , No. 11 , pp. 3391-3402
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of pulsed vacuum and ultrasound osmotic dehydration on drying of Chinese ginger ( Roscoe): Drying characteristics, antioxidant capacity, and volatile profiles.
An, Kejing;Tang, Daobang;Wu, Jijun;Fu, Manqin;Wen, Jing;Xiao, Gengsheng;Xu, Yujuan;
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. 2537-2545
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of three different lipid removal cleanup techniques prior to the analysis of sulfonamide drug residues in porcine tissues.
Wang, Jie;Hu, Qiuhui;Li, Peng;Fang, Yong;Yang, Wenjian;Ma, Ning;Pei, Fei;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 3006-3016
304 views DOI Abstract
2018
Fig extract drying: The relationship between the main operating parameters of a pilot-scale spray dryer and product specifications.
Kalantari, Maryam;Niakousari, Mehrdad;Haghighi-Manesh, Soroush;Rasouli, Mehrdad;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 325-333
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effective production of lactosucrose using β-fructofuranosidase and glucose oxidase co-immobilized by sol-gel encapsulation.
Long, Jie;Pan, Ting;Xie, Zhengjun;Xu, Xueming;Jin, Zhengyu;
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. 3302-3316
298 views DOI Abstract
View All 66 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
43
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

42.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.