Indexed in Journament

managed care (langhorne, pa)

ISSN 1062-3388· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,838 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 86.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name manag care
Abbreviated Name managed care (langhorne, pa)
ISSN 1062-3388

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 74.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for managed care (langhorne, pa)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 74.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2007
expressão citofotométrica do marcador cd34 no carcinoma epidermóide de esôfago citophotometric expression of cd34 in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 254-260
431 views DOI Abstract
2010
roux-en-y gastroenteroanastomosis in the treatment of stenosing and advanced gastric adenocarcinoma gastroenteroanastomose em y de roux no tratamento do adenocarcinoma gástrico avançado e estenosante
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 90-93
378 views DOI Abstract
2007
estudo da morbimortalidade em pacientes com trauma pancreático morbimortality in patients with pancreatic trauma
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 8-11
342 views DOI Abstract
2011
complicações e óbitos nas operações para tratar a obesidade mórbida complications and deaths in operations to treat morbid obesity
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 282-284
340 views DOI Abstract
2013
consenso brasileiro sobre câncer gástrico: diretrizes para o câncer gástrico no brasil brazilian consensus in gastric cancer: guidelines for gastric cancer in brazil
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 2-6
332 views Abstract
2008
bypass gástrico laparoscópico com uso reduzido de suturas mecânicas laparoscopic gastric bypass with low use of stapler sutures
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 73-76
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
Why blockchain for health care may be finally turning the corner.
Vol. 27 , No. 12 , pp. 22-23
291 views Abstract
2010
the presence of bilobar tumor should be considered as a new limit for transplantation beyond the milan criteria? a presença de tumor bilobar deve ser considerado novo limite para exclusão de transplante em pacientes que excedem os critérios de milão?
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 19-23
288 views DOI Abstract
2018
Why blockchain for health care may be finally turning the corner.
Vol. 27 , No. 12 , pp. 22-23
291 views Abstract
2017
Orphan Drugs: Way Too Many, Way Too Expensive
Vol. 26 , pp. 12-17
276 views
2013
consenso brasileiro sobre câncer gástrico: diretrizes para o câncer gástrico no brasil brazilian consensus in gastric cancer: guidelines for gastric cancer in brazil
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 2-6
332 views Abstract
2012
incidência e fatores predisponentes da migração da fundoplicatura pela técnica de nissen-rossetti no tratamento da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico incidence and predisponent factors for the migration of the fundoplication by nissen-rossetti technique in the surgical treatment of gerd
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 75-80
167 views Abstract
2012
fatores associados com a gastrite crônica em pacientes com presença ou ausência do helicobacter pylori factors associated with chronic gastritis in patients with presence and absence of helicobacter pylori
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 96-100
250 views Abstract
2011
avaliação de refluxo ultra-distal com phmetria de múltiplos canais ultra-distal reflux evaluation with multiple channel phmonitoring
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 36-42
205 views DOI Abstract
2011
complicações e óbitos nas operações para tratar a obesidade mórbida complications and deaths in operations to treat morbid obesity
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 282-284
340 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,838 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.