managed care (langhorne, pa) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2998 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

managed care (langhorne, pa)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name manag care
Abbreviated Name managed care (langhorne, pa)
ISSN 1062-3388
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2007
expressão citofotométrica do marcador cd34 no carcinoma epidermóide de esôfago citophotometric expression of cd34 in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
;Olímpia Alves Teixeira Lima;Jurandir Marcondes Ribas-Filho;Nicolau Gregori Czeczko;Osvaldo Malafaia;Sonia Maria Scheneider Aoki;Ulrich Andreas Dietz;Ubirajara Rutilio Mendes e Ferreira de Araújo;Fernanda Marcondes Ribas
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 254-260
385 views DOI Abstract
2010
perfil epidemiológico e morbimortalidade dos pacientes submetidos à reconstrução de trânsito intestinal: experiência de um centro secundário do nordeste brasileiro epidemiologic profile and morbimortality of patients undergoing reconstruction intestinal transit: experience of a secundary health service in the northeast of brazil
;Jeany Borges e Silva;Djalma Ribeiro Costa;Francisco Julimar Correia de Menezes;José Marconi Tavares;Adryano Gonçalves Marques;Rodrigo Dornfeld Escalante
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 150-153
343 views DOI Abstract
2010
aspectos técnicos da interposição ileal com gastrectomia vertical como possível opção ao tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 2 technical aspects of ileal interposition with sleeve gastrectomy as a possible option for the treatment of type 2
;Aureo Ludovico de Paula;Alessandro Silva;AC. Carolina C.L de Paula;Sérgio Vencio;Alfredo Halpern
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 128-130
308 views DOI Abstract
2011
complicações e óbitos nas operações para tratar a obesidade mórbida complications and deaths in operations to treat morbid obesity
;Aluísio Stol;Giovana Gugelmin;Valdir Martins Lampa-Junior;Cassius Frigulha;Rafael Armíno Selbach
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 282-284
302 views DOI Abstract
2010
roux-en-y gastroenteroanastomosis in the treatment of stenosing and advanced gastric adenocarcinoma gastroenteroanastomose em y de roux no tratamento do adenocarcinoma gástrico avançado e estenosante
;Nelson Adami Andreollo;Luiz Roberto Lopes;João de Souza Coelho Neto;Henrique José Virgili Silveira
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 90-93
301 views DOI Abstract
2007
estudo da morbimortalidade em pacientes com trauma pancreático morbimortality in patients with pancreatic trauma
;Olival Cirilo Lucena da Fonseca Neto;Carlos Eduardo Caiado Anunciação;Antônio Lopes de Miranda
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 8-11
297 views DOI Abstract
2008
bypass gástrico laparoscópico com uso reduzido de suturas mecânicas laparoscopic gastric bypass with low use of stapler sutures
;Josemberg Marins Campos;Eudes Paiva Godoy;Luciana Teixeira de Siqueira;Luis Fernando Lobato Evangelista;Carolina de Souza Vasconcelos;Álvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz;Edmundo Machado Ferraz
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 73-76
270 views DOI Abstract
2013
consenso brasileiro sobre câncer gástrico: diretrizes para o câncer gástrico no brasil brazilian consensus in gastric cancer: guidelines for gastric cancer in brazil
;Bruno Zilberstein;Carlos Malheiros;Laercio Gomes Lourenço;Paulo Kassab;Carlos Eduardo Jacob;Antonio Carlos Weston;Cláudio José Caldas Bresciani;Osvaldo Castro;Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 2-6
263 views Abstract
2018
Why blockchain for health care may be finally turning the corner.
Kirkner, Richard Mark;
Vol. 27 , No. 12 , pp. 22-23
258 views Abstract
2010
the presence of bilobar tumor should be considered as a new limit for transplantation beyond the milan criteria? a presença de tumor bilobar deve ser considerado novo limite para exclusão de transplante em pacientes que excedem os critérios de milão?
;Raul Carlos Wahle;Adávio de Oliveira e Silva;Adriano Miziara Gonzalez;Jorge Marcelo Padilla Mancero;Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro-Junior;Francisco Leôncio Dazzi;Renato Ferrari Letrinta;Cristiane Maria de Freitas Ribeiro;Venâncio Avancini Ferreira Alves;Evandro Sobrosa Mello;Luiz Augusto Carbeiro D´Albuquerque
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 19-23
252 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.