Indexed in Journament

jnci cancer spectrum

ISSN 2515-5091· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #495 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
53 Articles
Scores higher than 98.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jnci cancer spectr
Abbreviated Name jnci cancer spectr
ISSN 2515-5091
URL https://academic.oup.com/jncics

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jnci cancer spectrum
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 90.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 69.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.9 5.8
Content Distribution 26.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (53)

2016
creatine kinase isoenzyme activity during and after an ultra-distance (200 km) run
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 357-361
546 views DOI Abstract
2018
"Still a Cancer Patient"-Associations of Cancer Identity With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health Care Use Among Cancer Survivors.
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. pky031
467 views DOI Abstract
2018
Affordability and Price Increases of New Cancer Drugs in Clinical Guidelines, 2007-2016.
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. pky016
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plasma Biomarkers of Insulin and the Insulin-like Growth Factor Axis, and Risk of Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Polyp.
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. pkz056
393 views DOI Abstract
2009
production of free radicals and catalase activity during acute exercise training in young men
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 113-118
381 views Abstract
2018
The Future Colorectal Cancer Burden Attributable to Modifiable Behaviors: A Pooled Cohort Study.
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. pky033
353 views DOI Abstract
2016
does small-sided-games’ court area influence metabolic, perceptual, and physical performance parameters of young elite basketball players?
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
337 views DOI Abstract
2015
effects of supplementation with acai ( euterpe oleracea mart.) berry-based juice blend on the blood antioxidant defence capacity and lipid profile in junior hurdlers. a pilot study
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 161-168
328 views DOI Abstract
2017
association of arch height with ankle muscle strength and physical performance in adult men
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 119-126
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
longitudinal effects of swimming on bone in adolescents: a pqct and dxa study
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 361-370
318 views DOI Abstract
2026
Intake of ultra-processed foods and accelerated epigenetic aging of colorectal tissues
DOI Abstract
2026
Cost-Effectiveness of liquid biopsy screening for gastric cancer in the United States
DOI Abstract
2026
Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Neighborhood Gentrification, Income Inequality, and Cancer Incidence Among Hispanic/Latino Adults
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Integrating efficacy and safety profile in advanced HCC: A network meta-analysis of first-line systemic therapies
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association of English language proficiency and breast cancer oncologic outcomes
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Challenges in Medical Algorithmic Fairness
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
HIV infection and survival in Hodgkin lymphoma: a real-world analysis of a multicenter research network
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Frailty and low utilization of curative-intent surgical resection in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Alcohol intake and risk of stomach cancer: a pooled analysis of 20 cohorts
44 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #495 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

69.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.