Affordability and Price Increases of New Cancer Drugs in Clinical Guidelines, 2007-2016.
Clicks: 371
ID: 4615
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
79.7
/100
363 views
294 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
In response to the rising cost of cancer drugs, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recently developed a value framework, known as "Evidence Blocks," to grade the efficacy, safety, evidence quality, evidence consistency, and affordability of treatments included in its clinical guidelines. The value scores were available for 55 of the 69 new cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2007 to 2016. Overall, the treatment costs for 95% of new cancer medicines in NCCN clinical guidelines were scored as "very expensive" or "expensive". In multivariable ordered logistic regression models, there was no association between the affordability of new cancer drugs and efficacy and safety data available in clinical guidelines. Most guideline-recommended drugs were subject to annual list price increases exceeding inflation.
| Reference Key |
hwang2018affordabilityjnci
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hwang, Thomas J;Kesselheim, Aaron S;Gyawali, Bishal; |
| Journal | jnci cancer spectrum |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jncics/pky016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.