Indexed in Journament

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine

ISSN 1437-4331· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,146 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 27.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Clin Chem Lab Med
Abbreviated Name clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN 1437-4331
URL http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cclm

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 58.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2014
anti-inflammatory activity of roots of cichorium intybus due to its inhibitory effect on various cytokines and antioxidant activity
;Waseem Rizvi;Mohd. Fayazuddin;Syed Shariq;Ompal Singh;Shagufta Moin;Kafil Akhtar;Anil Kumar
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 44-49
516 views DOI Abstract
2020
Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).
Bauçà, Josep Miquel;Imperiali, Claudia E;Robles, Juan;Díaz-Garzón, Jorge;Vuljanic, Dora;Begovic, Ermin;Tikhonov, Aleksei;Alic, Lejla;Nikler, Ana;Simundic, Ana-Maria;
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation.
Roelofsen-de Beer, Roseri;Wielders, Jos;Boursier, Guilaine;Vodnik, Tatjana;Vanstapel, Florent;Huisman, Willem;Vukasović, Ines;Vaubourdolle, Michel;Sönmez, Çiğdem;Linko, Solveig;Brugnoni, Duilio;Kroupis, Christos;Lohmander, Maria;Šprongl, Luděk;Bernabeu-Andreu, Francisco;Meško Brguljan, Pika;Thelen, Marc;
406 views DOI Abstract
2018
Measurement of sirolimus concentrations in human blood using an automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA): a multicenter evaluation.
Stove, Veronique;Ramos, Pedro Alía;Wallemacq, Pierre;Vogeser, Michael;Schuetzenmeister, Andre;Schmiedel, Christian;Shipkova, Maria;
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 764-775
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Han, Huan;Yang, Lan;Liu, Rui;Liu, Fang;Wu, Kai-Lang;Li, Jie;Liu, Xing-Hui;Zhu, Cheng-Liang;
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral outbreaks.
Lippi, Giuseppe;Plebani, Mario;
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrity of serum samples is changed by modified centrifugation conditions.
Miler, Marijana;Nikolac Gabaj, Nora;Culej, Jelena;Unic, Adriana;Vrtaric, Alen;Milevoj Kopcinovic, Lara;
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation and standardization of the ETP-based activated protein C resistance test for the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women: an unmet clinical and regulatory need.
Douxfils, Jonathan;Morimont, Laure;Delvigne, Anne-Sophie;Devel, Philippe;Masereel, Bernard;Haguet, Hélène;Bouvy, Céline;Dogné, Jean-Michel;
331 views DOI Abstract
2014
rasa nirdhāraṇa (assessment of taste) of leonotis nepetifolia (l.) r. br.: a preliminary study in healthy volunteers
;Reshmi Pushpan;K Nishtewsar
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 186-191
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
pharmacognostical evaluation of aerial parts of graptophyllum pictum (l.) griff. (syn: justicia picta linn.): a well-known folklore medicinal plant
;Pradeep Singh;Ratan L Khosa;Garima Mishra;Keshri K Jha
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 223-229
290 views DOI Abstract
2023
Assessing the status of European laboratories in evaluating biomarkers for chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and recommendations for improvement: insights from the 2022 EFLM Task Group on CKD survey.
Cavalier, Etienne;Makris, Konstantinos;Portakal, Oytun;Nikler, Ana;Datta, Pradip;Zima, Tomas;Delanaye, Pierre;, ;
159 views DOI Abstract
2022
Metabolomics: A New Tool to Reveal the Nature of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Guoqing Huang, Mingcai Li, Yan Li, Yushan Mao
15 views DOI Abstract
2020
Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).
Bauçà, Josep Miquel;Imperiali, Claudia E;Robles, Juan;Díaz-Garzón, Jorge;Vuljanic, Dora;Begovic, Ermin;Tikhonov, Aleksei;Alic, Lejla;Nikler, Ana;Simundic, Ana-Maria;
432 views DOI Abstract
2020
The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral outbreaks.
Lippi, Giuseppe;Plebani, Mario;
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Han, Huan;Yang, Lan;Liu, Rui;Liu, Fang;Wu, Kai-Lang;Li, Jie;Liu, Xing-Hui;Zhu, Cheng-Liang;
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
Long-term biological variation estimates of 13 hematological parameters in healthy Chinese subjects.
Li, Chenbin;Peng, Mingting;Wu, Ji;Du, Zhongli;Lu, Hong;Zhou, Wenbin;
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
Simultaneous quantitation of five triazole anti-fungal agents by paper spray-mass spectrometry.
Skaggs, Christine L;Ren, Greta J;Elgierari, El Taher M;Sturmer, Lillian R;Shi, Run Z;Manicke, Nicholas E;Kirkpatrick, Lindsey M;
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
SGKC/SSCC Annual Assembly 2019 28th-30th August 2019 Technopark, Zurich or Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine
not, found
Vol. 57 , pp. eA155-eA165
186 views DOI
2019
Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation.
Roelofsen-de Beer, Roseri;Wielders, Jos;Boursier, Guilaine;Vodnik, Tatjana;Vanstapel, Florent;Huisman, Willem;Vukasović, Ines;Vaubourdolle, Michel;Sönmez, Çiğdem;Linko, Solveig;Brugnoni, Duilio;Kroupis, Christos;Lohmander, Maria;Šprongl, Luděk;Bernabeu-Andreu, Francisco;Meško Brguljan, Pika;Thelen, Marc;
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
A new indirect estimation of reference intervals: Truncated minimum chi-square (TMC) approach
Wosniok, W.
, pp. 0-0
252 views DOI
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,146 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.