Indexed in Journament

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine

ISSN 1437-4331· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9/100
Journament Score
#8,494
Journament Rank
31
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Clin Chem Lab Med
Abbreviated Name clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN 1437-4331
URL http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cclm

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2014
anti-inflammatory activity of roots of cichorium intybus due to its inhibitory effect on various cytokines and antioxidant activity
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 44-49
501 views DOI Abstract
2020
Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).
423 views DOI Abstract
2018
Measurement of sirolimus concentrations in human blood using an automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA): a multicenter evaluation.
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 764-775
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation.
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation and standardization of the ETP-based activated protein C resistance test for the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women: an unmet clinical and regulatory need.
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrity of serum samples is changed by modified centrifugation conditions.
326 views DOI Abstract
2014
rasa nirdhāraṇa (assessment of taste) of leonotis nepetifolia (l.) r. br.: a preliminary study in healthy volunteers
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 186-191
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
The search for a new test of early cancer detection
Vol. 57 , pp. E139-E140
283 views DOI
2023
Assessing the status of European laboratories in evaluating biomarkers for chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and recommendations for improvement: insights from the 2022 EFLM Task Group on CKD survey.
144 views DOI Abstract
2022
Metabolomics: A New Tool to Reveal the Nature of Diabetic Kidney Disease
6 views DOI Abstract
2020
Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
Long-term biological variation estimates of 13 hematological parameters in healthy Chinese subjects.
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
Simultaneous quantitation of five triazole anti-fungal agents by paper spray-mass spectrometry.
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation.
382 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.