psychotherapy and psychosomatics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#998 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

psychotherapy and psychosomatics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name psychother psychosom
Abbreviated Name psychother psychosom
ISSN 1423-0348
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.karger.com/PPS
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (133 total)

2010
gene expression profile of renal cell carcinoma clear cell type
;Marcos F. Dall’Oglio;Rafael F. Coelho;Katia R. M. Leite;Juliana M. Sousa-Canavez;Paulo S. L. Oliveira;Miguel Srougi
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 410-419
612 views DOI Abstract
2010
vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) and prostate pathology
;Francisco Botelho;Francisco Pina;Pedro Silva;Gabriela Figueiredo;Francisco Cruz;Nuno Lunet
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 430-438
541 views DOI Abstract
2013
comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors
;Wei Chen;Linhui Wang;Qing Yang;Bing Liu;Yinghao Sun
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 189-194
521 views Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of Stress-Reducing Interventions on the Response to Challenges to the Immune System: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Schakel, Lemmy;Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S;Crompvoets, Paige I;Bosch, Jos A;Cohen, Sheldon;van Middendorp, Henriët;Joosten, Simone A;Ottenhoff, Tom H M;Visser, Leo G;Evers, Andrea W M;
, pp. 1-13
463 views DOI Abstract
2006
laparoscopic-assisted nephroureterectomy after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma
;Frederico R. Romero;Michael Muntener;Sompol Permpongkosol;Louis R. Kavoussi;Thomas W. Jarrett
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 631-639
441 views DOI Abstract
simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy by retroperitoneal approach
;Piotr Jarzemski;Sławomir Listopadzki;Piotr Słupski;Marcin Jarzemski;Bartosz Brzoszczyk
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 538-544
426 views DOI Abstract
2015
the efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – a prospective randomized controlled study
;Bannakij Lojanapiwat;Tanarit Chureemas;Pruit Kittirattarakarn
Vol. 41 , No. 5 , pp. 945-952
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral and Chronobiological Intervention for Insomnia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Dekker, Kim;Benjamins, Jeroen S;Maksimovic, Teodora;Filardi, Marco;Hofman, Winni F;van Straten, Annemieke;Van Someren, Eus J W;
, pp. 1-2
413 views DOI
2015
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Christian Winther Topp;Søren Dinesen Østergaard;Susan Søndergaard;Per Bech;
Vol. 84 , No. 3 , pp. 167-176
409 views Abstract
2014
effects of chronic administration of tamsulosin and tadalafil, alone or in combination, in rats with bladder outlet obstruction induced by chronic nitric oxide deficiency
;Rommel Prata Regadas;Ricardo Reges;João Batista Gadelha Cerqueira;Daniel Gabrielle Sucupira;Francisco Vagnaldo F. Jamacaru;Manoel Odorico de Moraes;Lúcio Flávio Gonzaga-Silva
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 546-552
388 views DOI Abstract
View All 133 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.