The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Clicks: 499
ID: 119822
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
499 views
346 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 133 articles by views in psychotherapy and psychosomatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological well-being. Since its first publication in 1998, the WHO-5 has been translated into more than 30 languages and has been used in research studies all over the world. We now provide a systematic rev
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (51 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
topp2015psychotherapythe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Christian Winther Topp;Søren Dinesen Østergaard;Susan Søndergaard;Per Bech; |
| Journal | psychotherapy and psychosomatics |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.