Indexed in Journament

turkish journal of agriculture: food science and technology

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,003 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 52.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name turkish journal of agriculture: food science and technology
Abbreviated Name turkish journal of agriculture: food science and technology
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 53.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for turkish journal of agriculture: food science and technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 53.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2016
Nigeria: Positioning Rural Economy for Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals
Vol. 4 , No. 9 , pp. 752-757
698 views Abstract
2018
The Anticancer Activity of Cetraria Islandica (L.) Ach in Breast Cancer Cells Through Crosstalk of Ampk-α1 and Erk1/2 Signalling
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 783-791
581 views Abstract
2019
Input Use Efficiency in Sunflower Production; A Case Study of Konya Province (Karatay District)
Vol. 7 , No. 11 , pp. 2012-2017
576 views Abstract
2011
blastocyst cryopreservation using solid surface vitrification: a preliminary study
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 114-120
513 views DOI Abstract
2018
Ordu - Boztepe's Tourism and Recreation Potential with Boztepe's Contribution on the City Image
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 291-298
484 views Abstract
2018
Limni Gölü Tabiat Parkı Peyzaj Değerlerinin Rekreasyonel Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 680-688
482 views Abstract
2017
Determinants of Adoption of Wheat Production Technology Package by Smallholder Farmers: Evidences from Eastern Ethiopia
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 267-274
479 views Abstract
2016
Vernonia amygdalina: An Underutilized Vegetable with Nutraceutical Potentials – A Review
Vol. 4 , No. 9 , pp. 763-768
472 views Abstract
2022
Silimarin’in Paklitaksel Kaynaklı Nefrotoksisiteye Karşı Koruyucu Etkileri
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 452-458
33 views Abstract
2019
Input Use Efficiency in Sunflower Production; A Case Study of Konya Province (Karatay District)
Vol. 7 , No. 11 , pp. 2012-2017
576 views Abstract
2019
Alışveriş Arabalarının Mikrobiyolojik Durumunun İncelenmesi
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. 1132-1137
153 views Abstract
2018
Farklı Oranlarda Keçiboynuzu Unu İçeren Pestillerin Bazı Fiziksel, Kimyasal ve Duyusal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi
Vol. 6 , No. 8 , pp. 945-952
42 views Abstract
2018
Türkiye’de Orman, Park ve Fidanlıklarda Görülen Phytophthora Kök Çürüklüğü Hastalıkları ve Korunma Önlemleri
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 770-782
208 views Abstract
2018
one plus one is better than two: cumulative reproductive outcomes are better after two elective single blastocyst embryo transfers compared to one double blastocyst embryo transfer
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 161-168
280 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,003 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.