Indexed in Journament

International journal of biological macromolecules

ISSN 1879-0003· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.1 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #60 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
200 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Biol Macromol
Abbreviated Name int j biol macromol
ISSN 1879-0003
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-biological-macromolecules

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for International journal of biological macromolecules
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 70.0 15.9
Diversity 71.0 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 11.4 11.5
Content Distribution 70.3 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (200)

2019
Biocompatible carbon dots derived from κ-carrageenan and phenyl boronic acid for dual modality sensing platform of sugar and its anti-diabetic drug release behavior.
Vol. 132 , pp. 316-329
758 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anticancerous potential of polysaccharides sequentially extracted from Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua in Human cervical cancer Hela cells.
640 views DOI Abstract
2018
Purification and characterization of a cystatin like thiol protease inhibitor from Brassica nigra.
636 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel morpholine containing cinnamoyl amides as potent tyrosinase inhibitors.
Vol. 135 , pp. 978-985
557 views DOI Abstract
2025
Unlocking the potential of bacterial cellulose: synthesis, functionalization, and industrial impact.
Vol. 311 , pp. 143951
93 views DOI Abstract
2025
Type 3 resistant starch prepared from jackfruit alleviated the hyperlipidemia via gut microbiota regulation.
Vol. 310 , pp. 143452
183 views DOI Abstract
2025
Cyclodextrins as non-viral vectors in cancer theranostics: A review.
, pp. 143697
75 views DOI Abstract
2025
Unraveling the adaptive evolution and functional diversification of Rab GTPases in Salix matsudana under salt condition.
, pp. 143615
72 views DOI Abstract
2025
2025
Genome-wide identification of the MYB gene family and FfMYB13 regulation analysis in cell wall synthesis underlying tissue toughening process of yellow Flammulina filiformis stipes.
Vol. 288 , pp. 138660
146 views DOI Abstract
2025
Full utilization of Flammulina filiformis spent mushroom substrate for sustainable production of oil/water separation bacterial nanocellulose composite with high liquid flux and seperation efficiency.
Vol. 305 , No. Pt 1 , pp. 140861
141 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.1/100 · Average
Ranked #60 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.1/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

71.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.