journal of biomedicine and biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2455 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

journal of biomedicine and biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
Abbreviated Name journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2011
Placental Leucine Aminopeptidase- and Aminopeptidase A- Deficient Mice Offer Insight concerning the Mechanisms Underlying Preterm Labor and Preeclampsia
Mizutani, Shigehiko;Wright, John W.;Kobayashi, Hiroshi;
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
492 views Abstract
2008
Using Growing Self-Organising Maps to Improve the Binning Process in Environmental Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing
Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth;Hsu, Arthur L.;Tang, Sen-Lin;Halgamuge, Saman K.;
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
426 views Abstract
2008
Peptide Mimicrying Between SARS Coronavirus Spike Protein and Human Proteins Reacts with SARS Patient Serum
Hwa, K.-Y.;Lin, W. M.;Hou, Y.-I.;Yeh, T.-M.;
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2012
Evaluation of Plant and Fungal Extracts for Their Potential Antigingivitis and Anticaries Activity
Spratt, D. A.;Daglia, M.;Papetti, A.;Stauder, M.;O'Donnell, D.;Ciric, L.;Tymon, A.;Repetto, B.;Signoretto, C.;Houri-Haddad, Y.;Feldman, M.;Steinberg, D.;Lawton, S.;Lingström, P.;Pratten, J.;Zaura, E.;Gazzani, G.;Pruzzo, C.;Wilson, M.;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2012
Modulation of Tight Junction Structure and Function by Kinases and Phosphatases Targeting Occludin
Dörfel, Max Johannes;Huber, Otmar;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
386 views Abstract
2012
Using Medical History Embedded in Biometrics Medical Card for User Identity Authentication: Data Representation by AVT Hierarchical Data Tree
Fong, Simon;Zhuang, Yan;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
380 views Abstract
2009
The Venturia Apple Pathosystem: Pathogenicity Mechanisms and Plant Defense Responses
Jha, Gopaljee;Thakur, Karnika;Thakur, Priyanka;
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
372 views Abstract
2010
Emerging Vaccine Informatics
He, Yongqun;Rappuoli, Rino;Groot, Anne S. De;Chen, Robert T.;
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
346 views Abstract
2004
LC/PDA/ESI-MS Profiling and Radical Scavenging Activity of Anthocyanins in Various Berries
Nakajima, Jun-ichiro;Tanaka, Ippei;Seo, Shujiro;Yamazaki, Mami;Saito, Kazuki;
Vol. 2004 , No. 5 , pp. 241-247
308 views Abstract
2010
hubungan antara harga diri dengan sikap terhadap perilaku seksual pranikah pada remaja dari keluarga broken home
;Haesty Mulyana R.D;Santi E Purnamasari
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. -
301 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.