Indexed in Journament

journal of biomedicine and biotechnology

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,807 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 8.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
Abbreviated Name journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 42.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 40.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 42.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 40.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2008
Using Growing Self-Organising Maps to Improve the Binning Process in Environmental Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
463 views Abstract
2012
Evaluation of Plant and Fungal Extracts for Their Potential Antigingivitis and Anticaries Activity
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
449 views Abstract
2008
Peptide Mimicrying Between SARS Coronavirus Spike Protein and Human Proteins Reacts with SARS Patient Serum
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2012
Modulation of Tight Junction Structure and Function by Kinases and Phosphatases Targeting Occludin
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2009
The Venturia Apple Pathosystem: Pathogenicity Mechanisms and Plant Defense Responses
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
416 views Abstract
2010
Emerging Vaccine Informatics
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
388 views Abstract
2010
hubungan antara harga diri dengan sikap terhadap perilaku seksual pranikah pada remaja dari keluarga broken home
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. -
343 views DOI Abstract
2004
LC/PDA/ESI-MS Profiling and Radical Scavenging Activity of Anthocyanins in Various Berries
Vol. 2004 , No. 5 , pp. 241-247
343 views Abstract
2016
cover
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. -
32 views DOI Abstract
2016
analisis kualitas hidup penderita dan keluarga pasca serangan stroke (dengan gejala sisa)
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
84 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh pendidikan kesehatan terhadap kemandirian keluarga dalam merawat pasien tuberculosis di wilayah kerja puskesmas surakarta
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. -
99 views DOI Abstract
2014
kontrol diri pada peserta didik di smp negeri 2 kutasari, purbalingga tahun pelajaran 2012/2013
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
86 views DOI Abstract
2013
penelitian tentang successful aging (studi tentang lanjut usia yang anak dan keluarganya tinggal bersama)
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
36 views DOI Abstract
2012
Modulation of Tight Junction Structure and Function by Kinases and Phosphatases Targeting Occludin
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2012
Evaluation of Plant and Fungal Extracts for Their Potential Antigingivitis and Anticaries Activity
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
449 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,807 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

40.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.