Indexed in Journament

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

ISSN 1535-2900· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,834 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
184 Articles
Scores higher than 69.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Am J Health Syst Pharm
Abbreviated Name am j health syst pharm
ISSN 1535-2900
URL http://www.ajhp.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 20.9
Innovation 61.5 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.1
Content Distribution 17.8 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (184)

2019
ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Workforce-2018.
Schneider, Philip J;Pedersen, Craig A;Ganio, Michael C;Scheckelhoff, Douglas J;
Vol. 76 , No. 15 , pp. 1127-1141
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Implications for medication dosing for transgender patients: A review of the literature and recommendations for pharmacists.
Webb, Andrew J;McManus, Dayna;Rouse, Ginger E;Vonderheyde, Robyn;Topal, Jeffrey E;
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of a chemotherapy workload and productivity dashboard on pharmacy technician turnover.
Trinh, Long D;Wong, Jason T;Sullivan, Patricia A;Nguyen, Lam H;Pham, Yen T;
Vol. 76 , No. 13 , pp. 992-997
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of multiple methods to measure impact of a centralized call center on academic health system community pharmacies.
Nickman, Nancy A;Drews, Frank A;Tyler, Linda S;Kelly, Michael P;Ragsdale, Russell J;Rim, Matthew;
Vol. 76 , No. 6 , pp. 353-359
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of a central call center on employee perceptions of safety culture within community pharmacies in an academic health system.
Bowden, Ashley;Mullin, Shantel;Tak, Casey;Tyler, Linda S;Nickman, Nancy A;Moorman, Krystal;
Vol. 76 , No. 6 , pp. 360-365
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building resilience to combat stress, burnout, and suicidal ideation among pharmacists.
Chisholm-Burns, Marie A;
Vol. 76 , No. 18 , pp. 1364-1367
406 views DOI
2020
Assessment of hospital emergency medication kit use at a large academic medical center with automated dispensing machine technology.
Smith, Bradley L;Griffin, Monica G;Heyliger, Alexander;Ritchie, Brianne M;
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci, Tyler G;Hedrick, Tanner L;Roberts, Patricia A;Lin, Kinny;South, Mark D;Willoughby, Ian R;Eckel, Stephen F;Hess, Elizabeth T;Eberwein, Samuel;Amerine, Lindsey B;
Vol. 76 , No. 14 , pp. 1071-1077
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementation of a pharmacy technician residency program in a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Youmbi, Karen V;Shane, Rita;
Vol. 76 , No. 8 , pp. 543-550
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using informatics and mobile health to improve medication safety monitoring in kidney transplant recipients
Taber, D.
Vol. 76 , pp. 1143-1149
359 views DOI
2026
“At Your Service” or Going the Extra Mile Personal Reflections
Charles D. Ponte
DOI Abstract
2026
The Layered Learning Practice Model: Perspectives, Challenges, and Future Directions
Jennifer N. Wisniewski, Mary E Fredrickson, Anna Nogid, Emily P Jones, Kristy Brittain
DOI
2026
Summarizing the evidence on health-system impacts of smart pump interoperability: A scoping review
Elizabeth V Glashan, Linh Nguyen, Shi Yi Xiong, Janice Y. Kung, Taryn Buoy, Cheryl A Sadowski
DOI Abstract
2026
An unfortunate choice
Essilvo Sulejmani
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Integration of the medication regimen complexity – intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score into an electronic health record and comparison to an institution-specific clinical monitoring score at a large, tertiary, community hospital
Paige Putz, Andrea Sikora, Ryan Lamberg, Kelli Henry, Aaron Chase, Paul Huiras
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Parting thoughts on AI and the future of pharmacy practice
Michael T. Rupp
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Guidelines for validating mass spectrometry–based analyses as stability indicating for AJHP
Kevin R. Tucker, Edward C. Navarre, Marcelo J. Nieto
5 views DOI
2026
Quality indicators measuring pharmaceutical care for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease within primary care: a scoping review
Claire D. Visser, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Martina Teichert
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Implementing Clinical Pharmacy Technician Roles to Scale Pharmacogenomics Services in a Large Integrated Health System
Amanda McQuillan, Lisa Bryan, Shawn Dalton, Jill Bates
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Impact of Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Drug Therapy Management in Gender-Affirming Care
Anthony Gerber, Josh Rickard
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,834 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.