American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists | Journament

Journal Ranking

#822 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
85
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Am J Health Syst Pharm
Abbreviated Name am j health syst pharm
ISSN 1535-2900
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.ajhp.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (61 total)

2020
Implications for medication dosing for transgender patients: A review of the literature and recommendations for pharmacists.
Webb, Andrew J;McManus, Dayna;Rouse, Ginger E;Vonderheyde, Robyn;Topal, Jeffrey E;
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Workforce-2018.
Schneider, Philip J;Pedersen, Craig A;Ganio, Michael C;Scheckelhoff, Douglas J;
Vol. 76 , No. 15 , pp. 1127-1141
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of multiple methods to measure impact of a centralized call center on academic health system community pharmacies.
Nickman, Nancy A;Drews, Frank A;Tyler, Linda S;Kelly, Michael P;Ragsdale, Russell J;Rim, Matthew;
Vol. 76 , No. 6 , pp. 353-359
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of a chemotherapy workload and productivity dashboard on pharmacy technician turnover.
Trinh, Long D;Wong, Jason T;Sullivan, Patricia A;Nguyen, Lam H;Pham, Yen T;
Vol. 76 , No. 13 , pp. 992-997
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of a central call center on employee perceptions of safety culture within community pharmacies in an academic health system.
Bowden, Ashley;Mullin, Shantel;Tak, Casey;Tyler, Linda S;Nickman, Nancy A;Moorman, Krystal;
Vol. 76 , No. 6 , pp. 360-365
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of hospital emergency medication kit use at a large academic medical center with automated dispensing machine technology.
Smith, Bradley L;Griffin, Monica G;Heyliger, Alexander;Ritchie, Brianne M;
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementation of a pharmacy technician residency program in a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Youmbi, Karen V;Shane, Rita;
Vol. 76 , No. 8 , pp. 543-550
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci, Tyler G;Hedrick, Tanner L;Roberts, Patricia A;Lin, Kinny;South, Mark D;Willoughby, Ian R;Eckel, Stephen F;Hess, Elizabeth T;Eberwein, Samuel;Amerine, Lindsey B;
Vol. 76 , No. 14 , pp. 1071-1077
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building resilience to combat stress, burnout, and suicidal ideation among pharmacists.
Chisholm-Burns, Marie A;
Vol. 76 , No. 18 , pp. 1364-1367
329 views DOI
2019
Using informatics and mobile health to improve medication safety monitoring in kidney transplant recipients
Taber, D.
Vol. 76 , pp. 1143-1149
307 views DOI
View All 61 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
85
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.