European radiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1552 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

European radiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Eur Radiol
Abbreviated Name european radiology
ISSN 1432-1084
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/medicine/radiology/journal/330
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2019
Long-term follow-up of persistent pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules with deep learning-assisted nodule segmentation.
Qi, Lin-Lin;Wu, Bo-Tong;Tang, Wei;Zhou, Li-Na;Huang, Yao;Zhao, Shi-Jun;Liu, Li;Li, Meng;Zhang, Li;Feng, Shi-Chao;Hou, Dong-Hui;Zhou, Zhen;Li, Xiu-Li;Wang, Yi-Zhou;Wu, Ning;Wang, Jian-Wei;
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Encouraging MSK imaging research towards clinical impact is a necessity: opinion paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)
Tagliafico, A.
Vol. 29 , pp. 3410-3413
385 views DOI
2020
Automated volumetric assessment with artificial neural networks might enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Brugnara, Gianluca;Isensee, Fabian;Neuberger, Ulf;Bonekamp, David;Petersen, Jens;Diem, Ricarda;Wildemann, Brigitte;Heiland, Sabine;Wick, Wolfgang;Bendszus, Martin;Maier-Hein, Klaus;Kickingereder, Philipp;
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep learning with ultrasonography: automated classification of liver fibrosis using a deep convolutional neural network.
Lee, Jeong Hyun;Joo, Ijin;Kang, Tae Wook;Paik, Yong Han;Sinn, Dong Hyun;Ha, Sang Yun;Kim, Kyunga;Choi, Choonghwan;Lee, Gunwoo;Yi, Jonghyon;Bang, Won-Chul;
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Implementation of eHealth and AI integrated diagnostics with multidisciplinary digitized data: are we ready from an international perspective?
Bukowski, Mark;Farkas, Robert;Beyan, Oya;Moll, Lorna;Hahn, Horst;Kiessling, Fabian;Schmitz-Rode, Thomas;
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of liver fibrosis severity using computed tomography-based liver and spleen volumetric indices in patients with chronic liver disease.
Son, Jung Hee;Lee, Seung Soo;Lee, Yedaun;Kang, Bo-Kyeong;Sung, Yu Sub;Jo, SoRa;Yu, Eunsil;
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of knee pain from MR imaging using a convolutional Siamese network.
Chang, Gary H;Felson, David T;Qiu, Shangran;Guermazi, Ali;Capellini, Terence D;Kolachalama, Vijaya B;
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR).
Francone, Marco;Budde, Ricardo P J;Bremerich, Jens;Dacher, Jean Nicolas;Loewe, Christian;Wolf, Florian;Natale, Luigi;Pontone, Gianluca;Redheuil, Alban;Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn;Nikolaou, Kostantin;Gutberlet, Matthias;Salgado, Rodrigo;
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Temporal validation of metabolic nodal response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent predictor of unresectable disease, survival, and recurrence
Findlay, J.
Vol. 29 , pp. 6717-6727
317 views DOI
2019
Radiomics of small renal masses on multiphasic CT: accuracy of machine learning-based classification models for the differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.
Yang, Ruimeng;Wu, Jialiang;Sun, Lei;Lai, Shengsheng;Xu, Yikai;Liu, Xilong;Ma, Ying;Zhen, Xin;
309 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.