Automated volumetric assessment with artificial neural networks might enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Clicks: 397
ID: 96577
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
67.7
/100
397 views
274 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3 of 34 articles by views in European radiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regularly undergo MRI for assessment of disease burden. However, interpretation may be time consuming and prone to intra- and interobserver variability. Here, we evaluate the potential of artificial neural networks (ANN) for automated volumetric assessment of MS disease burden and activity on MRI.A single-institutional dataset with 334 MS patients (334 MRI exams) was used to develop and train an ANN for automated identification and volumetric segmentation of T2/FLAIR-hyperintense and contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions. Independent testing was performed in a single-institutional longitudinal dataset with 82 patients (266 MRI exams). We evaluated lesion detection performance (F1 scores), lesion segmentation agreement (DICE coefficients), and lesion volume agreement (concordance correlation coefficients [CCC]). Independent evaluation was performed on the public ISBI-2015 challenge dataset.The F1 score was maximized in the training set at a detection threshold of 7 mm for T2/FLAIR lesions and 14 mm for CE lesions. In the training set, mean F1 scores were 0.867 for T2/FLAIR lesions and 0.636 for CE lesions, as compared to 0.878 for T2/FLAIR lesions and 0.715 for CE lesions in the test set. Using these thresholds, the ANN yielded mean DICE coefficients of 0.834 and 0.878 for segmentation of T2/FLAIR and CE lesions in the training set (fivefold cross-validation). Corresponding DICE coefficients in the test set were 0.846 for T2/FLAIR lesions and 0.908 for CE lesions, and the CCC was ≥ 0.960 in each dataset.Our results highlight the capability of ANN for quantitative state-of-the-art assessment of volumetric lesion load on MRI and potentially enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with MS.• Artificial neural networks (ANN) can accurately detect and segment both T2/FLAIR and contrast-enhancing MS lesions in MRI data. • Performance of the ANN was consistent in a clinically derived dataset, with patients presenting all possible disease stages in MRI scans acquired from standard clinical routine rather than with high-quality research sequences. • Computer-aided evaluation of MS with ANN could streamline both clinical and research procedures in the volumetric assessment of MS disease burden as well as in lesion detection.
| Reference Key |
brugnara2020automatedeuropean
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Brugnara, Gianluca;Isensee, Fabian;Neuberger, Ulf;Bonekamp, David;Petersen, Jens;Diem, Ricarda;Wildemann, Brigitte;Heiland, Sabine;Wick, Wolfgang;Bendszus, Martin;Maier-Hein, Klaus;Kickingereder, Philipp; |
| Journal | European radiology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s00330-019-06593-y
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.