Indexed in Journament

international immunology

ISSN 1460-2377· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,829 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 73.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int immunol
Abbreviated Name int immunol
ISSN 1460-2377

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international immunology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 90.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.8
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 33.5 7.8
Content Distribution 18.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2019
Analysis of intestinal immunity and flora in a collagen-induced mouse arthritis model: differences during arthritis progression.
363 views DOI Abstract
2004
Antigen-independent acquisition of MHC class II molecules by human T lymphocytes
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. 1523-1533
226 views Abstract
2009
Regulatory T cells: how do they suppress immune responses?
54 views DOI Abstract
2009
The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition
50 views DOI Abstract
2005
Exosomal-like vesicles are present in human blood plasma
50 views DOI Abstract
2004
Toll-like receptors in innate immunity
43 views DOI Abstract
2007
Activation-induced FOXP3 in human T effector cells does not suppress proliferation or cytokine production
42 views DOI Abstract
2007
PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application
39 views DOI Abstract
2010
IL-6: from its discovery to clinical applications
38 views DOI Abstract
2020
IL-6 in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer
37 views DOI Abstract
2026
In This Issue
3 views DOI
2026
BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Activates Spike-Reactive Regulatory T Cells in Humans
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bispecific antibodies: current advances and future perspectives
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Healthy ageing: The struggle for maintaining T cells young
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Single-cell landscape of neutrophil activation in primary sclerosing cholangitis
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
In This Issue
19 views DOI
2026
Innate immune responses underlying local and systemic adverse reactions to mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccines
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Th1-Adapted Regulatory T Cells in Tumor Immunity and Inflammatory Diseases
20 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,829 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

18.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.