Indexed in Journament

international immunology

ISSN 1460-2377· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,102 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 58.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int immunol
Abbreviated Name int immunol
ISSN 1460-2377

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 90.0
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 25.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 7.5 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.4
Content Distribution 25.9 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2019
Analysis of intestinal immunity and flora in a collagen-induced mouse arthritis model: differences during arthritis progression.
Nemoto, Nobuhito;Takeda, Yuji;Nara, Hidetoshi;Araki, Akemi;Gazi, Yeashin;Takakubo, Yuya;Naganuma, Yasushi;Takagi, Michiaki;Asao, Hironobu;
385 views DOI Abstract
2004
Antigen-independent acquisition of MHC class II molecules by human T lymphocytes
Undale, Anita H.;van den Elsen, Peter J.;Celis, Esteban;
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. 1523-1533
237 views Abstract
2009
Regulatory T cells: how do they suppress immune responses?
Shimon Sakaguchi, Kajsa Wing, Y. Onishi, Paz Prieto-Martin, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi
70 views DOI Abstract
2009
The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition
Taro Kawai, Akira Shibuya
66 views DOI Abstract
2007
Activation-induced FOXP3 in human T effector cells does not suppress proliferation or cytokine production
Samina Allan, Sarah Q. Crome, Natasha K. Crellin, Laura Passerini, Theodore S. Steiner, Rosa Bacchetta, Maria Grazia Roncarolo, Megan K. Levings
65 views DOI Abstract
2005
Exosomal-like vesicles are present in human blood plasma
Marie-Pierre Caby, Danielle Lankar, Claude Vincendeau-Scherrer, Graça Raposo, Christian Bonnerot
63 views DOI Abstract
2010
IL-6: from its discovery to clinical applications
T Kishimoto
59 views DOI Abstract
2004
Toll-like receptors in innate immunity
Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira
53 views DOI Abstract
2007
PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application
Taku Okazaki, T Honjo
52 views DOI Abstract
2020
IL-6 in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer
Toshio Hirano
51 views DOI Abstract
2026
In This Issue
DOI
2026
Regulatory T cells exhibit differential therapeutic effects across tissues during chronic autoimmune inflammation
Yuji Nishimura, Yosuke Nagahata, Daiya Ohara, Koji Terada, Yuka Kobayashi, Yasutoshi Agata, Keiji Hirota, Hiroshi Kawamoto
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
PTPN22 mediates delayed negative feedback of T cell activation by forming an inhibitory signaling complex
Akiko Soneda Hashimoto, Yusuke Kawashima, Machie Sakuma, Natsumi Yoneda, Natsuko Tanimura, Manabu Nakayama, Haruhiko Koseki, Osamu Ohara, Bernard Malissen, Takashi Saito
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Polymorphic tail of HLA-DQ leads to the heterogeneous IL-10 response of antigen-presenting cells
Sho Matsushita, Rie Takagi, Mieko Tokano, Kazuyuki Nakagome, Tomoyuki Soma, Makoto Nagata, Masaaki Kawano
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
STK11 deficiency drives NSCLC immune resistance via ETNK2-mediated phosphoethanolamine accumulation
Wei Zhang, Jing Hu, Zhengbin Zhang
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
In This Issue
19 views DOI
2026
BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Activates Spike-Reactive Regulatory T Cells in Humans
Naila Shinwari, Xinxin Xue, Dongyun Lu, Celine Chua, Yayoi Iwamoto, Yuki Masuo, Sho Sekito, Daisuke Akiyama, Yasuhiro Murakawa, Takao Hashiguchi, 勇夫 伊藤, Hiroyuki Yoshitomi, Hideki Ueno
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Redefining long-lived plasma cells by timestamping: isotype- and tissue-specific logic of plasma cell longevity
Wataru Ise
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bispecific antibodies: current advances and future perspectives
Toshiya Hino, Yusuke Ito, Yuki Kagoya
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Healthy ageing: The struggle for maintaining T cells young
David Frieser, N. Gensous, Victor Appay
27 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,102 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

25.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.