Indexed in Journament

supportive care in cancer

ISSN 0941-4355· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,822 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 63% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name supportive care in cancer
Abbreviated Name supportive care in cancer
ISSN 0941-4355
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/520

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 33.3 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 74.1 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2019
comparative analysis of adverse events using different methods of prostate biopsy
;A. A. Keln;A. V. Zyryanov;A. A. Izmailov;P. B. Zotov;V. G. Znobishchev;А. V. Ponomarev
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 66-74
505 views DOI Abstract
2014
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients
U. Hess;C. Böhme;K. Rey;H. J. Senn;U. Hess;C. Böhme;K. Rey;H. J. Senn;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 402-409
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of Internet-based psycho-educational interventions on mental health and quality of life among cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Supportive Care in Cancer
Ying Wang;Yazhu Lin;Jingyi Chen;Chunfeng Wang;Rong Hu;Yong Wu;Ying Wang;Yazhu Lin;Jingyi Chen;Chunfeng Wang;Rong Hu;Yong Wu;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 2541-2552
430 views DOI Abstract
2018
NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim
Kirshner, J.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1323-1334
371 views DOI
2014
sparing cystectomy in patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder
;V. B. Matveyev;M. I. Volkova;K. M. Figurin;M. V. Peters
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 27-31
363 views Abstract
2018
comparison of the significance of the renal, padua, and c-index nephrometric scales for the prediction of the complexity of laparoscopic nephrectomy
;Yu. G. Alyaev;E. S. Sirota;L. M. Rapoport;E. A. Bezrukov;R. B. Sukhanov;D. G. Tsarichenko
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 36-46
357 views DOI Abstract
2008
Oral moxifloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone for the treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients suitable for early hospital discharge
Catherine Sebban;Sophie Dussart;Christine Fuhrmann;Hervé Ghesquieres;Isabelle Rodrigues;Lionel Geoffrois;Yves Devaux;Laurence Lancry;Giselle Chvetzoff;Thomas Bachelot;Maria Chelghoum;Pierre Biron;Catherine Sebban;Sophie Dussart;Christine Fuhrmann;Hervé Ghesquieres;Isabelle Rodrigues;Lionel Geoffrois;Yves Devaux;Laurence Lancry;Giselle Chvetzoff;Thomas Bachelot;Maria Chelghoum;Pierre Biron;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 , pp. 1017-1023
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Usability testing of EirV3—a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer
Krogstad, H.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1835-1844
353 views DOI
2019
The association of socioeconomic status with quality of life in cancer patients over a 6-month period using individual growth models
Roick, J.
Vol. 27 , pp. 3347-3355
348 views DOI
1970
Criteria for response in patients in clinical trials of empiric antibiotic regimens for febrile neutropenia. Is there agreement?
Ronald Feld;Ronald Feld;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 444-448
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of Internet-based psycho-educational interventions on mental health and quality of life among cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Supportive Care in Cancer
Ying Wang;Yazhu Lin;Jingyi Chen;Chunfeng Wang;Rong Hu;Yong Wu;Ying Wang;Yazhu Lin;Jingyi Chen;Chunfeng Wang;Rong Hu;Yong Wu;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 2541-2552
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Human Development Index and its association with staff spiritual care provision: a Middle Eastern oncology study (Supportive Care in Cancer, (2019), 27, 9, (3601-3610), 10.1007/s00520-019-04733-0)
Bar-Sela, G.
Vol. 27 , pp. 3611-3612
56 views DOI
2019
comparative analysis of adverse events using different methods of prostate biopsy
;A. A. Keln;A. V. Zyryanov;A. A. Izmailov;P. B. Zotov;V. G. Znobishchev;А. V. Ponomarev
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 66-74
505 views DOI Abstract
2019
Usability testing of EirV3—a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer
Krogstad, H.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1835-1844
353 views DOI
2019
Social support buffers against anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with cancer only if support is wanted: a large sample replication
Vodermaier, A.
, pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
2019
Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care: patient preferences from focus groups
Kim, W.
Vol. 27 , pp. 2949-2955
261 views DOI
2019
The association of socioeconomic status with quality of life in cancer patients over a 6-month period using individual growth models
Roick, J.
Vol. 27 , pp. 3347-3355
348 views DOI
2018
comparison of the significance of the renal, padua, and c-index nephrometric scales for the prediction of the complexity of laparoscopic nephrectomy
;Yu. G. Alyaev;E. S. Sirota;L. M. Rapoport;E. A. Bezrukov;R. B. Sukhanov;D. G. Tsarichenko
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 36-46
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim
Kirshner, J.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1323-1334
371 views DOI
2015
noninterventional studies of depot formulations of lhrh analogues for prostate cancer in routine clinical practice. the launch of an observational program to assess the use of eligard 45 mg in russia
;V. B. Matveev;A. S. Markova
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 68-72
239 views Abstract
Journament Score
34.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,822 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.