Diabetes research and clinical practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#991 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Diabetes research and clinical practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Abbreviated Name diabetes res clin pract
ISSN 1872-8227
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/diabetes-research-and-clinical-practice
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2019
Ramadan diurnal intermittent fasting modulates SOD2, TFAM, Nrf2, and sirtuins (SIRT1, SIRT3) gene expressions in subjects with overweight and obesity.
Madkour, Mohamed I;T El-Serafi, Ahmed;Jahrami, Haitham A;Sherif, Naglaa M;Hassan, Rasha E;Awadallah, Samir;Faris, Mo'ez Al-Islam E;
Vol. 155 , pp. 107801
491 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of HbA1c levels and body mass index for prevention of diabetic kidney disease: A retrospective longitudinal study using outpatient clinical data in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Nakanishi, Shuhei;Hirukawa, Hidenori;Shimoda, Masashi;Tatsumi, Fuminori;Kohara, Kenji;Obata, Atsushi;Okauchi, Seizo;Katakura, Yukino;Sanada, Junpei;Fushimi, Yoshiro;Kan, Yuki;Tomita, Akiko;Isobe, Hayato;Iwamoto, Hideyuki;Takahashi, Kaio;Mune, Tomoatsu;Kaku, Kohei;Kaneto, Hideaki;
Vol. 155 , pp. 107807
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Worldwide Estimates of Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality of Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition.
Patterson, Christopher C;Karuranga, Suvi;Salpea, Paraskevi;Saeedi, Pouya;Dahlquist, Gisela;Soltesz, Gyula;Ogle, Graham D;
, pp. 107842
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Audit of glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes referred to a pediatric clinic in a specialized center in Kuwait.
Al-Abdulrazzaq, Dalia;Al-Taiar, Abdulla;Shaltout, Azza;Davidsson, Lena;Al-Kandari, Hessa;
, pp. 107827
435 views DOI Abstract
2020
Closing the Indigenous Health Gap in Canada: Results from the TransFORmation of IndiGEnous PrimAry HEAlthcare Delivery (FORGE AHEAD) Program.
Naqshbandi Hayward, Mariam;Pace, Romina;Zaran, Harsh;Dyck, Roland;Hanley, Anthony J;Green, Michael E;Bhattacharyya, Onil;Zwarenstein, Merrick;Emond, Joelle;Benoit, Cynthia;Jebb, Marie L;Harris, Stewart B;, ;
, pp. 108066
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Infection in italian people with diabetes: lessons learned for our future (an experience to be used).
Gentile, Sandro;Strollo, Felice;Ceriello, Antonio;
, pp. 108137
410 views DOI
2019
Effects of obesity and a history of gestational diabetes on the risk of postpartum diabetes and hyperglycemia in Chinese Women: Obesity, GDM and diabetes risk.
Fan, Yuxin;Li, Weiqin;Liu, Huikun;Wang, Leishen;Zhang, Shuang;Li, Wei;Liu, Hongyan;Leng, Junhong;Shen, Yun;Tuomilehto, Jaakko;Yu, Zhijie;Yang, Xilin;Liu, Ming;Hu, Gang;
, pp. 107828
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Some say no, some say yes": Receiving inconsistent or insufficient information from healthcare professionals and consequences for diabetes self-management: A qualitative study in patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Maneze, Della;Weaver, Roslyn;Kovai, Vilas;Salamonson, Yenna;Astorga, Cecilia;Yogendran, Daisy;Everett, Bronwyn;
, pp. 107830
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycaemic, weight, and blood pressure changes associated with early versus later treatment intensification with dapagliflozin in United Kingdom primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
P H Wilding, John;Rigney, Una;Blak, Betina T;Nolan, Stephen T;Fenici, Peter;Medina, Jesús;
, pp. 107791
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serum growth differentiation factor 15 is associated with glucose metabolism in the third trimester in Chinese pregnant women.
Tang, Mengyang;Luo, Mingjuan;Lu, Wenqian;Wang, Shiyun;Zhang, Rong;Liang, Wei;Gu, Jianfen;Yu, Xuemei;Zhang, Xueli;Hu, Cheng;
, pp. 107823
347 views DOI Abstract
View All 50 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.