indian journal of pharmacology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#391 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

indian journal of pharmacology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name indian j pharmacol
Abbreviated Name indian j pharmacol
ISSN 1998-3751
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (250 total)

2008
efficacy of argon plasma coagulation compared with topical formalin application for chronic radiation proctopathy
;AA Alfadhli;WM Alazmi;T Ponich;JM Howard;I Prokopiw;A Alaqeel;JC Gregor
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 129-132
410 views DOI Abstract
2008
colonoscopic preoperative localization using submucosal injection of radiolabelled colloid
;Carolyn Cho;Sanjiv Jain;Mark Pilbeam;Noel Tait;Andrew Thomson
Vol. 22 , No. 7 , pp. 637-639
394 views DOI Abstract
2005
pegylated-interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis c after liver transplantation: from a canadian experience to recommendations for therapy
;Mohamed Babatin;Lynn Schindel;Kelly W Burak
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 359-365
370 views DOI Abstract
2004
capsule endoscopy: a single centre experience with the first 226 capsules
;R Enns;K Go;H Chang;K Pluta
Vol. 18 , No. 9 , pp. 555-558
339 views DOI Abstract
2002
funding the new biologics – public policy issues in drug formulary decision making
;Steven Lewis
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 869-872
318 views DOI Abstract
2003
sex differences of brain serotonin synthesis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome using α-[11c]methyl-l-tryptophan, positron emission tomography and statistical parametric mapping
;Akio Nakai;Yoshikata Kumakura;Michel Boivin;Pedro Rosa;Mirko Diksic;Doreen D’Souza;Kathryn Kersey
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 191-196
311 views DOI Abstract
Protective effect of rutin on cognitive impairment caused by phenytoin.
Dubey, Shagun;Ganeshpurkar, Aditya;Bansal, Divya;Dubey, Nazneen;
Vol. 47 , No. 6 , pp. 627-31
286 views DOI Abstract
2008
the costs of colonoscopy in a canadian hospital using a microcosting approach
;Nour Sharara;Viviane Adam;Ralph Crott;Alan N Barkun
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 565-570
281 views DOI Abstract
2007
endoscopic ph monitoring for patients with suspected or refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
;Brian G Turner;John R Saltzman;Ling Hua;Rie Maurer;Natan Feldman;David L Carr-Locke;Robert Burakoff;Julia J Liu
Vol. 21 , No. 11 , pp. 737-741
280 views DOI Abstract
2012
endoscopic management of biliary complications following liver transplantation after donation from cardiac death donors
;Kris P Croome;Vivian McAlister;Paul Adams;Paul Marotta;William Wall;Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
Vol. 26 , No. 9 , pp. 607-610
278 views DOI Abstract
View All 250 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.