Indexed in Journament

new cinemas

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,428 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 23.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name new cinemas
Abbreviated Name new cinemas
URL https://www.intellectbooks.com/new-cinemas-journal-of-contemporary-film

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 1.4 4.4
Content Distribution 62.2 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2014
Unsettling the metaphor: The failure of liberal hybridity in Fatih Akin's crossing the bridge
Özselçuk, E.
Vol. 12 , pp. 173-189
383 views DOI
2015
the bibliographic comparison of information management and knowledge management fields through their scientific outputs; with the emphasis on the share of information science in each of these fields
;Mortaza kokabi;Gholamreza Heidari;Mansoureh Serati Shirazi
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 397-417
313 views Abstract
2018
On desire, failure and fear: Utopia and dystopia in contemporary cinema
Klonowska, B.
Vol. 16 , pp. 11-28
305 views DOI
2012
quantitative study and structure visualization of scientific publications in the field of information management in web of science database during 1988-2009
;Afshin Hamdipour;Morteza Kokabi
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 39-70
300 views Abstract
2014
log analysis of the irandoc database and the analysis of its users’ information seeking behavior
;maryam khosravi;hamid Reza Jamali
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 979-1006
296 views Abstract
2008
thesauri on the web: current developments and trends
;Fakhrosadat Mohamadi
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 145-161
293 views Abstract
2007
consolidation of library softwares for creation of non-farsi union catalog case study: union catalog of agricultural publications
;Tayabeh Shahmirzadi;Sirous Davoodzadeh
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 51-70
291 views Abstract
2012
image semantic retrieval challenges and thesauri modern applications
;Farahnaz sadoughi;Ali Valinejadi;Hafez Mohammad hassanzadeh;Hamid Bouraghi;Parisa Pasyar
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 641-666
286 views Abstract
2017
conceptual modell of efficient market of databases in iran
;Mahshid Eltemasi
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 949-966
283 views Abstract
2015
information economy based on knowledge organization systems, with emphasis on folksonomy: dissertation of academic libraries
;Mahshid Eltemasi
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 923-937
282 views Abstract
2018
the role of trust and dependence on the performance of information systems in the knowledge-sharing process in ict of the municipality of shiraz
;Hamed Fallah Tafti;Razieh almasi sarvestani;Mahboube Hosseini
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 1451-1476
245 views Abstract
2018
On desire, failure and fear: Utopia and dystopia in contemporary cinema
Klonowska, B.
Vol. 16 , pp. 11-28
305 views DOI
2017
applying lundberg and halton theory in using scientific information database (sid): the case of ahvaz shahid chamran university postgraduate students
;Fariba Nazari;Zahed Bigdali;Avad Savari
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 1043-1064
242 views Abstract
2017
conceptual modell of efficient market of databases in iran
;Mahshid Eltemasi
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 949-966
283 views Abstract
2017
knowledge sharing network analysis and its relationship with the experience and education of librarians at ferdowsi university of mashhad
;Maryam Salami;Alireza Saadat Alijani
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 421-438
204 views Abstract
2016
the proposed model of factors influencing to adoption of cloud computing ecosystem in iran (university, industry and services sectors)
;Noor Mohammad Yaghubi;Zahra Hemmat;Maryam Rashki
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 555-580
42 views
2016
information interaction criteria among students in process of task-based information searching (role of objective complexity and type of product)
;Marziyeh Saeedizadeh;Abolfazl Taheri;Azam Sanatjoo
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 931-952
221 views Abstract
2016
survey of formal and informal citation in google search engine
;Afsaneh Teymourikhani
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 513-529
239 views Abstract
2016
performance and clique analysis of the iranian universities and research institutions informetrics: 10 years study
;Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh;Ehsan Geraei;Reza BasirianJahromi
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 325-347
250 views Abstract
2015
analysis of strategic plan dimensions for research development in organization of libraries, museums and documentation center of astan quds razavi
;Rahmatollah Fattahi;Mehri Parirokh;Mahmood Salari;Mohammad Zerehsaz;Reza Rajabali Beglou;Fatemeh Pazooki
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 573-602
186 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,428 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.