Indexed in Journament

The Biochemical journal

ISSN 0264-6021· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,712 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 39.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Biochem J
Abbreviated Name biochem j
ISSN 0264-6021
URL http://www.biochemj.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 62.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity — 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 4.3 11.5
Content Distribution 62.6 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

1984
Alterations in the relative amounts of specific mRNA species in the developing human brain in Down's syndrome
Whatley SA;Hall C;Davison AN;Lim L;;
Vol. 220 , No. 1 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2015
the right of the member to withdraw from limited liability company
;Г. О. Уразова
, No. 129 , pp. 129-138
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
PP2C phosphatase Pic1 negatively regulates phosphorylation status of Pti1b kinase, a regulator of flagellin-triggered immunity in tomato.
Giska, Fabian;Martin, Gregory B;
349 views DOI Abstract
2007
Exploring the specificity of the PI3K family inhibitor LY294002
Gharbi SI;Zvelebil MJ;Shuttleworth SJ;Hancox T;Saghir N;Timms JF;Waterfield MD;;
Vol. 404 , No. 1 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2014
the concept and characteristics of amnesty in ukraine
;Г. С. Крайник
, No. 125 , pp. 202-208
330 views DOI Abstract
2014
organizational and legal issues of ensuring the implementation of public and production environmental policy in the field of waste management
;Віталій Анатолійович Зуєв
, No. 125 , pp. 138-144
311 views DOI Abstract
2007
The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update
Bain J;Plater L;Elliott M;Shpiro N;Hastie CJ;McLauchlan H;Klevernic I;Arthur JS;Alessi DR;Cohen P;;
Vol. 408 , No. 3 , pp. -
303 views Abstract
2013
health and social consequences of substance abuse
;Г. А. Білецька
, No. 124 , pp. 177-186
292 views DOI Abstract
2014
civil control in local government: theory and practice
;О. А. Смоляр
, No. 125 , pp. 91-99
291 views DOI Abstract
1975
Acyl intermediates in penicillopepsin-catalysed reactions and a discussion of the mechanism of action of pepsins.
Takahashi, M;Hofmann, T;
Vol. 147 , No. 3 , pp. 549-63
290 views Abstract
2022
Construction of mouse cochlin mutants with different GAG-binding specificities and their use for immunohistochemistry.
Yamamoto, Kazuo;Murakami, Karin;Tamura, Ryo;Ikehara, Sanae;Ota, Hayato;Ichimiya, Tomomi;Matsumoto, Naoki;Matsubara, Hisahiro;Nishihara, Shoko;Ikehara, Yuzuru;
160 views DOI Abstract
2019
PP2C phosphatase Pic1 negatively regulates phosphorylation status of Pti1b kinase, a regulator of flagellin-triggered immunity in tomato.
Giska, Fabian;Martin, Gregory B;
349 views DOI Abstract
2017
urbanization as an object of criminological research
;Вікторія Василівна Бойко
, No. 136 , pp. 236-241
220 views DOI Abstract
2017
victimological prevention murder committed for mercenary motives
;Юлія Олексіївна Оберемко
, No. 137 , pp. 149-156
166 views DOI Abstract
2017
disadvantages of legal engineering of the disclosure of certain norms of the budget code of ukraine
;Світлана Миколаївна Клімова
, No. 138 , pp. 78-88
124 views DOI Abstract
2017
the influence of the fundamentalization of human rights on the development of the right to a fair trial
;Nataliia Yurievna Sakara
, No. 138 , pp. 43-54
88 views DOI Abstract
2017
Екологічне право: роздуми про його витоки та перспективи розвитку
;Anatoly Getman;Віталій Анатолійович Зуєв
, No. 137 , pp. 75-91
206 views DOI Abstract
2017
invalidity of contract: legislative regulation and types
;Василь Іванович Крат
, No. 138 , pp. 8-16
122 views DOI Abstract
2017
education content issues: theoretical and practical aspects
;Олена Юріївна Кузнецова
, No. 138 , pp. 230-236
199 views DOI Abstract
2017
legislative regulation of relations in the sphere of innovations in education
;Микола Іванович Легенький
, No. 136 , pp. 144-152
139 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,712 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.