The Biochemical journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2118 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 16 ساعة

The Biochemical journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
scopus ncbi
الاسم المختصر Biochem J
الاسم المختصر biochem j
ISSN 0264-6021
الهدف والنطاق
URL http://www.biochemj.org
تعليمات المؤلفين
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

1984
Alterations in the relative amounts of specific mRNA species in the developing human brain in Down's syndrome
Whatley SA;Hall C;Davison AN;Lim L;;
Vol. 220 , No. 1 , pp. -
388 views Abstract
2015
the right of the member to withdraw from limited liability company
;Г. О. Уразова
, No. 129 , pp. 129-138
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
PP2C phosphatase Pic1 negatively regulates phosphorylation status of Pti1b kinase, a regulator of flagellin-triggered immunity in tomato.
Giska, Fabian;Martin, Gregory B;
302 views DOI Abstract
2007
Exploring the specificity of the PI3K family inhibitor LY294002
Gharbi SI;Zvelebil MJ;Shuttleworth SJ;Hancox T;Saghir N;Timms JF;Waterfield MD;;
Vol. 404 , No. 1 , pp. -
297 views Abstract
2014
the concept and characteristics of amnesty in ukraine
;Г. С. Крайник
, No. 125 , pp. 202-208
287 views DOI Abstract
2007
The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update
Bain J;Plater L;Elliott M;Shpiro N;Hastie CJ;McLauchlan H;Klevernic I;Arthur JS;Alessi DR;Cohen P;;
Vol. 408 , No. 3 , pp. -
270 views Abstract
2014
organizational and legal issues of ensuring the implementation of public and production environmental policy in the field of waste management
;Віталій Анатолійович Зуєв
, No. 125 , pp. 138-144
265 views DOI Abstract
1975
Acyl intermediates in penicillopepsin-catalysed reactions and a discussion of the mechanism of action of pepsins.
Takahashi, M;Hofmann, T;
Vol. 147 , No. 3 , pp. 549-63
258 views Abstract
2013
health and social consequences of substance abuse
;Г. А. Білецька
, No. 124 , pp. 177-186
236 views DOI Abstract
2014
civil control in local government: theory and practice
;О. А. Смоляр
, No. 125 , pp. 91-99
229 views DOI Abstract
View All 44 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.