Indexed in Journament

Aesthetic surgery journal

ISSN 1527-330X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,442 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
73 Articles
Scores higher than 64.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Aesthet Surg J
Abbreviated Name aesthet surg j
ISSN 1527-330X

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 34.5 13.4
Content Distribution 19.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (73)

2018
The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following?
Chandawarkar, Akash A;Gould, Daniel J;Grant Stevens, W;
Vol. 38 , No. 8 , pp. 913-917
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical Management of Cosmetic Surgery Tourism-Related Complications: Current Trends and Cost Analysis Study of the Financial Impact on the UK National Health Service (NHS).
Thacoor, Amitabh;van den Bosch, Peter;Akhavani, Mohammed Ali;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 786-791
403 views DOI Abstract
2012
iGuide to plastic surgery: iPhone apps, the plastic surgeon, and the health care environment.
Mohan, Anita Tanniru;Branford, Olivier Alexandre;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 653-8
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is Histological Evaluation of Reduction Mammaplasty Specimens Worthwhile?
Demirdover, Cenk;Geyik, Alper;Vayvada, Haluk;Menderes, Adnan;
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. NP178-NP184
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
Defining "Ideal Abs" Through a Crowdsourcing-Based Assessment.
Gould, Daniel J;Shauly, Orr;Qureshi, Ali A;Stevens, W Grant;
229 views DOI Abstract
2018
"Me Too" Isn't Just about Somebody Else
Nahai, F.
Vol. 38 , pp. 1153-1155
197 views DOI
2026
PhaseOne Hypochlorous Acid is Effective for Preventing Capsular Contracture and Infection in Primary Breast Augmentation
Thomas Xia, Amir Aminzada, David Nguyen, Rohun Gupta, Jason Lin, Sumesh Kaswan, Herluf Lund
145 views DOI Abstract
2024
Future Perspective of Risk Prediction in Aesthetic Surgery: Is Artificial Intelligence Reliable?
Duran, Alpay;Cortuk, Oguz;Ok, Bora;
114 views DOI Abstract
2026
Unnecessary Roughness: Why Surface Topography and Host Response Interpretation Matter
Joshua C. Doloff, Mark W. Clemens, Omid Veiseh
38 views DOI
2026
Applying Aesthetic Outcome Measures to GLP-1-associated Weight Loss: Considerations for Interpretation
Gemma Sharp
37 views DOI
2026
Vision Loss Following Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty Injections: Systematic Review of Cases and Management
Evan Pistone, Manav M Patel, Kimberley C. Brondeel, Philong Nguyen, J Micheal Smith
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Functional Performance, Subject-body Perception, and Safety Following Multi-muscle Electromuscular Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
Kiya Movassaghi, Niloo Marashi, Shlomit Mann, Ruthie Amir
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Injection Mapping and Dose Escalation For Botulinum Toxin Treatment on the Lower Face: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Victor R M Munoz-Lora, Victor Rogerio, Pietra Roschel, Lorenna Zillo, Sebastian Cotofana, Marcelo Germani
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Litigating Filler Complications: Five Decades of Legal Outcomes in the United States
Tran Binh Le, David Le, Stephanie Vaidis, Katie G. Egan, David W. Mathes, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David Khechoyan, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Commentary on: Phase-One Hypochlorous Acid is Effective for Preventing Capsular Contracture and Infection in Primary Breast Augmentation
William P Adams
12 views DOI
2026
The Regenerative Potential of GHK-Cu in Aesthetic Medicine
Jonathan Mokhtar, Basel Mohamad, Jewel Haddad, Alma Said, Arya Menon, Lucas Kreutz‐Rodrigues, Krishna S Vyas, Curtis L Cetrulo, Alexandre G. Lellouch
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Intraoral Anatomy of the Buccal Nerve for Buccal Fat Pad and Facelift Procedures
Ahmet Ertaş, Semih Bağhaki, Elif C İbiş, Ömer Alp Taştan, Kıvanç Göral, İlke Ali̇ Gürses
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Rapid Identification of Low-quality Meta-analyses in Plastic Surgery Using the Meta-analysis Critique (MAC) Tool
Cameron F. Leveille, Natalia Lewandowski, Quentin Tsang, Isabella Churchill, Xi Ming Zhu, Lucas Gallo, Brian Chin, Christopher J. Coroneos
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Layers to Loadbearing: The Face as a Prestressed Biotensegrity System
T. Papadopoulos
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Who Is Recognized as a “Top” Plastic Surgeon? Gender Disparities and Surgeon Concentration in National Rankings
Gabrielle Knauer, Andrew Kalra, Aryan Gupta, Carolyn Silverman, Jennifer L. Walden, Adam Walchak, Sameer A. Patel
27 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,442 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.