Future Perspective of Risk Prediction in Aesthetic Surgery: Is Artificial Intelligence Reliable?

Clicks: 128
ID: 279329
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #8 of 90 articles by views in Aesthetic surgery journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are showing significant potential in the medical field. The rapid advancement in artificial intelligence methods suggests their soon-to-be essential role in physicians' practices.This study seeks to assess and compare the readability, clarity, and precision of medical knowledge responses provided by three large language models (LLMs) and informed consent forms for 14 common aesthetic surgical procedures, as prepared by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).The efficacy, readability and accuracy of three leading LLMs, ChatGPT-4 (San Francisco, CA), Gemini (Google, Mountain View, California), and Copilot (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA), was systematically evaluated using 14 different prompts related to the risks of 14 common aesthetic procedures. Alongside these LLM responses, risk sections from the informed consent forms of these procedures, provided by the ASPS, were also reviewed.The risk factor segments of the combined general and specific operation consent forms were rated highest for medical knowledge accuracy. (p<0.05) Regarding readability and clarity, the procedure-specific informed consent forms, including LLMs, scored highest scores. (p<0.05) However, these same forms received the lowest score for medical knowledge accuracy. (p<0.05) Interestingly, surgeons preferred patient-facing materials created by Chat GPT-4, citing superior accuracy and medical information compared to other artificial intelligence (AI) tools.Physicians prefer patient-facing materials created by Chat GPT-4 over other AI tools due to their precise and comprehensive medical knowledge. Importantly, adherence to ASPS' strong recommendation for signing both the procedure-specific and the general informed consent forms can avoid potential future complications and ethical concerns, thereby ensuring patients receive adequate information.
Reference Key
duran2024futureaesthetic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Duran, Alpay;Cortuk, Oguz;Ok, Bora;
Journal Aesthetic surgery journal
Year 2024
DOI
sjae140
URL
Keywords
degenerative clinical guidelines chatgpt cervical radiculopathy

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.