Indexed in Journament

american journal of alzheimer's disease and other dementias

ISSN 1938-2731· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,553 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
54 Articles
Scores higher than 23% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name am j alzheimers dis other demen
Abbreviated Name am j alzheimers dis other demen
ISSN 1938-2731
URL http://aja.sagepub.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for american journal of alzheimer's disease and other dementias
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 3.6 5.8
Content Distribution 68.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (54)

2007
comparative study of sealing ability of three root canal sealers
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 186-192
432 views Abstract
2016
central odontogenic fibroma of mandible: a case report
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 329-333
431 views Abstract
2007
cytotoxicity evaluation of pro root mta, root mta and portland cement (pc) on l929 mouse fibroblasts
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 131-137
366 views Abstract
2015
effectiveness of an educational intervention based on the trans theoretical model in order to smoking cessation in patients referred to dental clinics
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 146-158
335 views Abstract
2018
evaluation of torque loss in co-cr castable abutments after cyclic loading
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 192-199
326 views Abstract
2006
the effect of bevel angle on apical microleakage following the use of amalgam and mta
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 43-48
322 views Abstract
2008
correction factors determination for panoramic radiography using a phantom of mandible
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 182-188
313 views Abstract
2019
Investigation of the Effects of Biochemical Parameters on Alzheimer's Disease.
, pp. 1533317519862108
251 views DOI Abstract
2018
invitro evaluation of the effect of some of the common carbonated beverages in iran on the microhardness of two resin composites
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 219-229
279 views Abstract
2018
evaluation of torque loss in co-cr castable abutments after cyclic loading
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 192-199
326 views Abstract
2017
effect of type of cavity preparation (bur,er:yag laser) and restorative materials on prevention of caries lesion
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 229-236
210 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of bonding strength of porcelain to some commercial nickel-base dental alloys and comparing their interface
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 164-172
200 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of general dentists’ knowledge regarding management of dental trauma
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 271-276
142 views Abstract
2017
2017
evaluation of last-year dental students\' opinions about undergraduate curriculum: before the revision (2010-11)
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 40-47
196 views
2016
central odontogenic fibroma of mandible: a case report
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 329-333
431 views Abstract
2015
comparative evaluation of feldespatic crowns fitness made from additional silicon impression and gypsum cast by cad/cam
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 26-32
190 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,553 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.