Indexed in Journament

korean journal of medical education

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,297 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 85.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name korean j med educ
Abbreviated Name korean journal of medical education
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 61.1
Innovation 63.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 33.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 61.1 24.4
Innovation 63.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 33.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2019
Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter’s examination: an educational audit
Tirpude, Amit Purushottam;Gaikwad, Manisha;Tirpude, Pradhnya Amit;Jain, Mantu;Bora, Santanu;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 115-124
560 views DOI Abstract
2016
Assessing effective physician-patient communication skills: "Are you listening to me, doc?"
Berman AC;Chutka DS;;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. -
404 views Abstract
2019
Applying a mixed methods design for needs assessment of an international fellowship training program for Mongolian health professions.
Amgalan, Nomin;Shin, Jwa-Seop;Lee, Seung-Hee;Badamdorj, Oyungoo;Yoon, Hyun-Bae;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 227-237
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nursing students' relationships among resilience, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and attitude to death.
Kim, Jihyun;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 251-260
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of e-learning in medical education: 10 years' experience of Korean medical schools.
Kim, Kyong-Jee;Kim, Giwoon;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 205-214
301 views DOI Abstract
2014
la memoria y el olvido: la censura del estado novo en portugal a travÉs de tres piezas de autores espaÑoles
;Ana Cabrera
, No. 10 , pp. -
289 views Abstract
2011
the discursive construction of the basque terrorist
;Atutxa Ordeñana, Ibai
, No. 5 , pp. 63-73
261 views Abstract
2014
aesthetics of opposition: the politics of metamorphosis in gerald vizenor’s bearheart
;Seyed Mohammad Marandi;Mohsen Hanif
, No. 11 , pp. 142-160
254 views Abstract
2019
An analysis of verbs used in the course outcomes of outcome-based integrated courses at a medical school based on the taxonomy of educational objectives.
Yeo, Sanghee;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 261-269
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
arte y repolitización urbana: autores, proyectos y estrategias desde el mayo francés hasta el 15-m
;Diego Luna
, No. 15 , pp. -
208 views Abstract
2024
Caffeine consumption of medical students in Korea: amount and symptoms based on a 2023 survey.
Choi, Seong Woo; Kim, Ye Won; Lee, Chang Yong; Jang, Hyung Su; Chae, Hee Seung; Choi, Ju Ha; Ko, Young Hwii
Vol. 36 , pp. 267-274
96 views DOI Abstract
2019
An analysis of verbs used in the course outcomes of outcome-based integrated courses at a medical school based on the taxonomy of educational objectives.
Yeo, Sanghee;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 261-269
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of e-learning in medical education: 10 years' experience of Korean medical schools.
Kim, Kyong-Jee;Kim, Giwoon;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 205-214
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Applying a mixed methods design for needs assessment of an international fellowship training program for Mongolian health professions.
Amgalan, Nomin;Shin, Jwa-Seop;Lee, Seung-Hee;Badamdorj, Oyungoo;Yoon, Hyun-Bae;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 227-237
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nursing students' relationships among resilience, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and attitude to death.
Kim, Jihyun;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 251-260
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter’s examination: an educational audit
Tirpude, Amit Purushottam;Gaikwad, Manisha;Tirpude, Pradhnya Amit;Jain, Mantu;Bora, Santanu;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 115-124
560 views DOI Abstract
2017
mapas y prácticas cartográficas en el cine de ignacio agüero
;Valeria de los Ríos
, No. 16 , pp. -
105 views Abstract
2017
imágenes (políticas) de vida: ¿el animal?, ¿el fósil? figuras del prisma poshumano en la obra de nuno ramos
;Victoria Cóccaro
, No. 17 , pp. -
184 views Abstract
2017
l’assaig segons joan fuster: l’article literari com a modalitat del gènere
;Josep Cano Mateu
, No. 17 , pp. -
20 views Abstract
2016
triángulos narrativos. aproximaciones a la combinatoria de géneros en la novela contemporánea
;Sergio Vidal
, No. 14 , pp. -
79 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,297 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

63.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

33.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.