Indexed in Journament

korean journal of medical education

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.4/100
Journament Score
#10,471
Journament Rank
28
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name korean j med educ
Abbreviated Name korean journal of medical education
ISSN 0000-0000

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2019
Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter’s examination: an educational audit
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 115-124
543 views DOI Abstract
2016
Assessing effective physician-patient communication skills: "Are you listening to me, doc?"
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. -
378 views Abstract
2019
Applying a mixed methods design for needs assessment of an international fellowship training program for Mongolian health professions.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 227-237
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of e-learning in medical education: 10 years' experience of Korean medical schools.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 205-214
281 views DOI Abstract
2011
the discursive construction of the basque terrorist
, No. 5 , pp. 63-73
242 views Abstract
2014
aesthetics of opposition: the politics of metamorphosis in gerald vizenor’s bearheart
, No. 11 , pp. 142-160
230 views Abstract
2024
Caffeine consumption of medical students in Korea: amount and symptoms based on a 2023 survey.
Vol. 36 , pp. 267-274
65 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of e-learning in medical education: 10 years' experience of Korean medical schools.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 205-214
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
Applying a mixed methods design for needs assessment of an international fellowship training program for Mongolian health professions.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 227-237
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter’s examination: an educational audit
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 115-124
543 views DOI Abstract
2017
mapas y prácticas cartográficas en el cine de ignacio agüero
, No. 16 , pp. -
83 views Abstract
2017
33
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

33.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.