Canadian Medical Association Journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6767 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 minutes ago

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Canadian Medical Association Journal
Abbreviated Name can med assoc j
ISSN 0008-4409
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (61 total)

2013
short communication. single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ovine csn1s2 gene for alphas2–casein
;J. A. Padilla;J. M. Corral;A. Quesada;M. Izuierdo;J. C. Parejo;M. E. Martínez-Trancón
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 80-83
348 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparison of growth performance and immune responses of broiler chicks reared under heat stress, cold stress and thermoneutral conditions
;Ali Olfati;Ali Mojtahedin;Tayebeh Sadeghi;Mohsen Akbari;Felipe Martínez-Pastor
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. e0505-e0505
328 views DOI Abstract
2015
is multifunctionality the future of mountain pastoralism? lessons from the management of semi-natural grasslands in the pyrenees
;Feliu López-i-Gelats;Marta G. Rivera-Ferre;Cristina Madruga-Andreu;Jordi Bartolomé-Filella
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. e0307-e0307
323 views DOI Abstract
2014
a comparison of controlled self-pollination and open pollination results based on maize grain quality
;Hanna Sulewska;Jozef Adamczyk;Hennryk Cygert;Janusz Rogacki;Grazyna Szymanska;Karolina Smiatacz;Katarzyna Panasiewicz;Kamila Tomaszyk
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 492-500
323 views DOI Abstract
1981
Premie nutrition: mother's milk may be best.
Chance, G;
Vol. 124 , No. 10 , pp. 1247-8
317 views
2013
influence of tillage practices on soil biologically active organic matter content over a growing season under semiarid mediterranean climate
;D. Martín-Lammerding;J. L. Tenorio;M. M. Albarrán;E. Zambrana;I. Walter
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 232-243
295 views DOI Abstract
2017
residual toxicity of insecticides used in tunisian citrus orchards on the imported parasitoid diachasmimorpha longicaudata (hymenoptera: braconidae): implications for ipm program of ceratitis capitata (diptera: tephritidae)
;Ahlem Harbi;Khaled Abbes;Beatriz Sabater-Muñoz;Francisco Beitia;Brahim Chermiti
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. e1008-e1008
294 views DOI Abstract
2017
prevalence and risk factors for stillbirths in holstein cows in a hot environment
;Miguel Mellado;María I. Chávez;Ulises Macías-Cruz;Leonel Avendaño-Reyes;Evaristo Carrillo;José E. García
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. e0403-e0403
292 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of energy concentration on growth performance and carcass quality of iberian pigs reared under intensive conditions
;M. P. Serrano;L. Camara;D. G. Valencia;R. Lazaro;M. A. Latorre;G. G. Mateos
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 405-416
279 views DOI Abstract
2013
short communication. presence, quantification and phylogeny of israeli acute paralysis virus of honeybees in andalusia (spain)
;M. Vicente-Rubiano;D. Kukielka;A. I. de las Heras;J. M. Sanchez-Vizcaino
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 708-713
277 views DOI Abstract
View All 61 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.