Indexed in Journament

cognition and emotion

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,257 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
143 Articles
Scores higher than 61.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name cognition and emotion
Abbreviated Name cognition and emotion

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 49.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for cognition and emotion
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 55.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 6.4 13.4
Content Distribution 49.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (143)

2003
prevalencia de la incontinencia urinaria en personas mayores de 64 años en galicia prevalence of urinary incontinence in the population aged more than 64 years in galicia, spain
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 409-411
556 views Abstract
2007
evolución de las desigualdades según la clase social en el control del embarazo en barcelona (1994-97 frente a 2000-03) trends in social inequalities in pregnancy care in barcelona (spain), 1994-97 versus 2000-03
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 378-383
529 views Abstract
2010
prevalencia de diabetes mellitus y factores de riesgo cardiovascular en la población adulta de la comunidad de madrid: estudio predimerc prevalence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk factors in the adult population of the autonomous region of madrid (spain): the predimerc study
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 233-240
510 views Abstract
2018
formación, la clave para mejorar las competencias informacionales en e-salud del alumnado de bachillerato
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 48-53
448 views DOI Abstract
2010
diseño y validación de un cuestionario para medir la continuidad asistencial entre niveles desde la perspectiva del usuario: ccaena design and validation of a questionnaire to measure continuity between care levels from the user's perspective
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 339-346
436 views Abstract
2012
derivación de pacientes geriátricos subagudos a un hospital de atención intermedia como alternativa a la permanencia en un hospital general intermediate hospital care for subacute elderly patients as an alternative to prolonged acute hospitalization
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 166-169
430 views Abstract
2013
escuelas saludables y participativas: evaluación de una estrategia de salud pública healthy and participative schools: evaluation of a public health strategy
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 104-110
421 views Abstract
2018
asociación entre diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y actividad física en personas con antecedentes familiares de diabetes
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 230-235
294 views Abstract
2018
desigualdades socioeconómicas en el control mamográfico en mujeres españolas de 45 a 69 años de edad
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 61-67
278 views DOI Abstract
2018
marcos grade de la evidencia a la decisión (etd): un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 2: guías de práctica clínica
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 167.e1-167.e10
77 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de atención integrada y proactiva a pacientes crónicos complejos
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 18-26
22 views DOI Abstract
2018
gaceta sanitaria en 2017. mejorando la calidad de nuestra revista
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 117-120
96 views DOI
2018
employee reactions to the use of management control systems in hospitals: motivation vs. threat
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 129-134
196 views DOI Abstract
2018
relación entre sistemas de costes y gasto hospitalario
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 158-165
16 views DOI Abstract
2018
formación, la clave para mejorar las competencias informacionales en e-salud del alumnado de bachillerato
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 48-53
448 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,257 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

49.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.