proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3685 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.ias.ac.in/journal/mathsci
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (99 total)

2014
problems and new attitudes of business evaluation for m&a in kazakhstan
;Sanam S. Mirzaliyeva;Ilyas N. Rakhimzhanov
Vol. 81 , No. 8-2 , pp. 1546-1550
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary decomposition and normality of certain determinantal ideals
Saha, J.
Vol. 129 , pp. 0-0
301 views DOI
2016
comparative analysis of conditions life in settlements the municipality of berane and settlements the municipality of andrijevica: a case study
;Goran Rajović;Jelisavka Bulatović
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. 87-106
286 views DOI Abstract
2013
the image of russia on the western screen in the ideological confrontation epoch (1946-1991): from the late stalinism to the “thaw”, from "détente" and "stagnation" to the "perestroika"
;Alexander Fedorov
Vol. 53 , No. 6-2 , pp. 1772-1786
286 views Abstract
2013
results of “pedagogical competence” notion analysis
;Botakoz A. Zhekibaeva;Gulzam Abilkasimova
Vol. 60 , No. 10-1 , pp. 2460-2465
283 views Abstract
2013
reasons for physical inactivity of disengaged students at klaipeda university
;Artūras Janauskas
Vol. 47 , No. 4-3 , pp. 1019-1022
281 views Abstract
2011
benefits of creating information security management system on the enterprise using 1c: enterprise and mathematical models
;Sergey V. Razumnikov
, No. 5-1 , pp. 727-728
267 views Abstract
2013
role of agro-industrial sphere in food supply security of the republic of kazakhstan
;Maira Sh. Kenzhebolatova
Vol. 60 , No. 10-1 , pp. 2414-2425
265 views Abstract
2013
the impact of hurricane katrina on the united states tourism industry
;Nemanja Tomić;Milivoj B. Gavrilov;Sanja Božić;Rastislav Stojsavljević;Slobodan B. Marković
Vol. 51 , No. 5-4 , pp. 1581-1590
247 views Abstract
2015
child ragpickers in india and violation of their human rights
;Pyali Chatterjee
Vol. 91 , No. 2 , pp. 155-162
244 views DOI Abstract
View All 99 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.