Indexed in Journament

proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,405 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
99 Articles
Scores higher than 23.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the indian academy of sciences: mathematical sciences
URL https://www.ias.ac.in/journal/mathsci

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 20.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.1
Content Distribution 61.3 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (99)

2013
the image of russia on the western screen in the ideological confrontation epoch (1946-1991): from the late stalinism to the “thaw”, from "détente" and "stagnation" to the "perestroika"
;Alexander Fedorov
Vol. 53 , No. 6-2 , pp. 1772-1786
417 views Abstract
2014
problems and new attitudes of business evaluation for m&a in kazakhstan
;Sanam S. Mirzaliyeva;Ilyas N. Rakhimzhanov
Vol. 81 , No. 8-2 , pp. 1546-1550
391 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparative analysis of conditions life in settlements the municipality of berane and settlements the municipality of andrijevica: a case study
;Goran Rajović;Jelisavka Bulatović
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. 87-106
349 views DOI Abstract
2013
reasons for physical inactivity of disengaged students at klaipeda university
;Artūras Janauskas
Vol. 47 , No. 4-3 , pp. 1019-1022
344 views Abstract
2019
Primary decomposition and normality of certain determinantal ideals
Saha, J.
Vol. 129 , pp. 0-0
339 views DOI
2013
results of “pedagogical competence” notion analysis
;Botakoz A. Zhekibaeva;Gulzam Abilkasimova
Vol. 60 , No. 10-1 , pp. 2460-2465
335 views Abstract
2015
child ragpickers in india and violation of their human rights
;Pyali Chatterjee
Vol. 91 , No. 2 , pp. 155-162
331 views DOI Abstract
2014
stress in community health agents: a bioethics protection perspective
;Ulysses Rodrigues de Castro;Antonio José Pacheco Palha;Nelson Rocha de Oliveira;José Carlos Amado Martins
Vol. 83 , No. 9-2 , pp. 1707-1717
323 views DOI Abstract
2013
role of agro-industrial sphere in food supply security of the republic of kazakhstan
;Maira Sh. Kenzhebolatova
Vol. 60 , No. 10-1 , pp. 2414-2425
316 views Abstract
2011
benefits of creating information security management system on the enterprise using 1c: enterprise and mathematical models
;Sergey V. Razumnikov
, No. 5-1 , pp. 727-728
311 views Abstract
2020
Rainbow 2-connectivity of edge-comb product of a cycle and a Hamiltonian graph
Bača, M.
Vol. 130 , pp. 0-0
143 views DOI
2019
Stable range one on non-zero divisors
Bisht, N.
Vol. 129 , pp. 0-0
124 views DOI
2019
Primary decomposition and normality of certain determinantal ideals
Saha, J.
Vol. 129 , pp. 0-0
339 views DOI
2016
comparative analysis of conditions life in settlements the municipality of berane and settlements the municipality of andrijevica: a case study
;Goran Rajović;Jelisavka Bulatović
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. 87-106
349 views DOI Abstract
2015
implementation of the basic functions of metaphors in the work piece ofo. wilde “a woman of no importance“
;Eleonora Zhdanova ;Saltanat Beiskhanova;Nilzhan Abzhamalova
Vol. 93 , No. 4 , pp. 312-318
228 views DOI Abstract
2015
automation of methods for the subjective measuring of factors in the operation of automated information systems by means of vba
;Lyudmila V. Gorbatova;Alla V. Oleinikova;Bakytgul M. Sadanova;Galiya S. Mukhasheva
Vol. 90 , No. 1 , pp. 26-31
188 views DOI Abstract
2015
the problems of gender and national inequality in municipal management
;Svetlana A. Nefedkina;Ekaterina Zhordan
Vol. 98 , No. 9 , pp. 612-618
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
perceptions of students towards quality of services at private higher education institution in bosnia and herzegovina
;Aldina Rastoder;Ekrem Nurović;Edin Smajić;Ensar Mekić
Vol. 101 , No. 12 , pp. 783-790
284 views DOI Abstract
2015
ethical analysis of the functioning of media in society and media texts in the classroom
;Alexander Fedorov
Vol. 99 , No. 10 , pp. 684-690
143 views DOI Abstract
2015
the current trends in the residential development of landscape and geomorphological tiers of the republic of dagestan
;Vitaly V. Bratkov ;Zagir V. Ataev
Vol. 93 , No. 4 , pp. 282-289
32 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,405 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.