liver transplantation : official publication of the american association for the study of liver diseases and the international liver transplantation society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4161 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

liver transplantation : official publication of the american association for the study of liver diseases and the international liver transplantation society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name liver transpl
Abbreviated Name liver transpl
ISSN 1527-6473
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/lt/Pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (91 total)

2019
Patient perspectives of weight gain following orthotopic liver transplantation: a qualitative study.
Bolton, Louise A;Walsh, Siobhan M;O'Sullivan, Niamh B;Barnes, Elizabeth;McCormick, Aiden P;Corish, Clare A;
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
Temporal Changes and Regional Variation in Acceptance of HCV-viremic Livers.
Mazur, Rafal D;Goldberg, David S;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exercise training is safe and feasible in patients awaiting liver transplantation: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Wallen, Matthew P;Keating, Shelley E;Hall, Adrian;Hickman, Ingrid J;Pavey, Toby G;Woodward, Aidan J;Skinner, Tina L;Macdonald, Graeme A;Coombes, Jeff S;
367 views DOI Abstract
2016
Splenectomy is not indicated in living donor liver transplantation.
Ito, Kyoji;Akamatsu, Nobuhisa;Ichida, Akihiko;Ito, Daisuke;Kaneko, Junichi;Arita, Junichi;Sakamoto, Yoshihiro;Hasegawa, Kiyoshi;Kokudo, Norihiro;
Vol. 22 , No. 11 , pp. 1526-1535
291 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of baseline systolic blood pressure on visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: the kailuan study
;Wang A;Li Z;Yang Y;Chen G;Wang C;Wu Y;Ruan C;Liu Y;Wang Y;Wu S
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1191-1196
285 views Abstract
2016
eculizumab in the management of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: patient selection and special considerations
;Al-Ani F;Chin-Yee I;Lazo-Langner A
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1161-1170
283 views Abstract
2017
increased risk of endotracheal intubation and heart failure following acute myocardial infarction in patients with urolithiasis: a nationwide population-based study
;Lin SK;Liu JM;Chang YH;Ting YT;Pang ST;Hsu RJ;Lin PH
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 245-253
282 views Abstract
2017
use of direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease in patients with reduced renal function: a short review of the clinical evidence
;Willett KC;Morrill AM
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 447-454
280 views Abstract
2017
examining hemodialyzer membrane performance using proteomic technologies
;Bonomini M;Pieroni L;Di Liberato L;Sirolli V;Urbani A
Vol. Volume 14 , pp. 1-9
273 views Abstract
2010
new approaches in the management of spasticity in multiple sclerosis patients: role of cannabinoids
;Paul F Smith
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 59-63
252 views Abstract
View All 91 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.