Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients listed in short wait regions remain advantaged for liver transplant (LT) following 2015 HCC policy change.
Clicks: 269
ID: 71496
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
269 views
47 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #15 of 91 articles by views in liver transplantation : official publication of the american association for the study of liver diseases and the international liver transplantation society
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) listed for liver transplant (LT), United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) enacted policy changes in 2015 to improve equity between HCC and non-HCC patients. We evaluated the impact of these changes on regional disparities in wait-list dropout and LT. We included patients in the UNOS database listed with MELD HCC exception in long (LWR), mid (MWR), and short wait regions (SWR) before these policy changes (Era 1: 1/1/2013-12/31/2013) and after (Era 2: 10/7/2015-10/7/2016). Cumulative incidence of wait-list dropout and LT were evaluated using competing risk regression. Median time to LT increased by 3.6 months (3.1 to 6.7) in SWR and 1.3 months (6.9 to 8.2) in MWR (p<0.001), with slight decrease in LWR (13.4 to 12.9 months; p=0.02). The 2-year cumulative incidence of dropout increased from 9.7% to 14.8% in SWR (p=0.03) and from 18.9% to 22.6% in MWR (p=0.18), but decreased from 26.7% to 24.8% in LWR (p=0.31). Factors predicting wait-list dropout included listing in Era 2 (HR 1.17), in LWR (HR 2.56), and in MWR (HR 1.91). Regional differences in wait-list outcomes decreased with policy changes, but HCC patients in SWR remain advantaged. Recent policy change may narrow these disparities.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (105 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
brondfield2019hepatocellularliver
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Brondfield, Max N;Dodge, Jennifer L;Hirose, Ryutaro;Heimbach, Julie;Yao, Francis Y;Mehta, Neil; |
| Journal | liver transplantation : official publication of the american association for the study of liver diseases and the international liver transplantation society |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/lt.25701
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.