Indexed in Journament

flora montiberica

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,183 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 24.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name flora montiberica
Abbreviated Name flora montiberica
URL https://www.floramontiberica.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 9.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 85.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 9.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.4
Content Distribution 85.2 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
The Cultural Park of the poplar pollard of the High Alfambra. A rural development experience from the Ethnobotany.
Jaime, Lorén C.
Vol. 73 , pp. 65-72
330 views
2006
giovanni dosi - technological paradigms and technological trajectories
;David Rosenthal;Abraham Benzaquen Sicsú
Vol. 5 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 09-32
231 views
2019
On the varieties of Galium boreale L. In Álava (Spain).
Jáñez, Ortiz de Landaluce A.
Vol. 74 , pp. 27-31
220 views
2005
gestão da inovação tecnológica: estudo de cinco pmes portuguesas
;Ana María Barañano
Vol. 4 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 57-96
215 views Abstract
2006
convergência tecnológica e a formação de novos tipos de alianças estratégicas: uma análise do desenvolvimento dos personal digital assistant (pdas)
;Walter Tadahiro Shima;Danilo Eugênio Amorim
Vol. 5 , No. 2 jul/dez , pp. 273-313
210 views Abstract
2015
editorial
;Wilson Suzigan;Renato Garcia
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 7-8
208 views
2002
problem-solving and coordination-governance: advances in a competence-based perspective on the theory of the firm
;Giovanni Dosi;Benjamin Coriat
Vol. 1 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 49-84
206 views Abstract
2013
o impacto da interação universidade-empresa na produtividade dos pesquisadores: uma análise para as ciências exatas e da terra nas universidades estaduais paulistas
;Murilo Damião Carolo;Sérgio Kannebley Júnior;Rodrigo Baggi Prieto Alvarez
Vol. 12 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 171-206
205 views Abstract
2002
a rica fauna da política industrial e a sua nova fronteira
;Antonio Barros de Castro
Vol. 1 , No. 2 jul/dez , pp. 253-274
201 views Abstract
2013
estratégias de cooperação tecnológica transnacional em estados unidos e japão: uma comparação a partir de dados de patentes
;Cynthia Bastos Gomes;Ana Urraca Ruiz
Vol. 12 , No. 2 jul , pp. 345-384
194 views Abstract
2019
On the varieties of Galium boreale L. In Álava (Spain).
Jáñez, Ortiz de Landaluce A.
Vol. 74 , pp. 27-31
220 views
2019
The Cultural Park of the poplar pollard of the High Alfambra. A rural development experience from the Ethnobotany.
Jaime, Lorén C.
Vol. 73 , pp. 65-72
330 views
2015
editorial
;Wilson Suzigan;Renato Garcia
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 7-8
208 views
2013
estratégias de cooperação tecnológica transnacional em estados unidos e japão: uma comparação a partir de dados de patentes
;Cynthia Bastos Gomes;Ana Urraca Ruiz
Vol. 12 , No. 2 jul , pp. 345-384
194 views Abstract
2013
o impacto da interação universidade-empresa na produtividade dos pesquisadores: uma análise para as ciências exatas e da terra nas universidades estaduais paulistas
;Murilo Damião Carolo;Sérgio Kannebley Júnior;Rodrigo Baggi Prieto Alvarez
Vol. 12 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 171-206
205 views Abstract
2011
modelo evolucionário de aprendizado agrícola
;José Maria Ferreira da Silveira;José Eustáquio Ribeiro Vieira Filho
Vol. 10 , No. 2 jul/dez , pp. 265-300
170 views Abstract
2008
kenneth j. arrow - economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention
;José Maria Ferreira Jardim da Silveira
Vol. 7 , No. 2 jul/dez , pp. 261-286
155 views
2006
convergência tecnológica e a formação de novos tipos de alianças estratégicas: uma análise do desenvolvimento dos personal digital assistant (pdas)
;Walter Tadahiro Shima;Danilo Eugênio Amorim
Vol. 5 , No. 2 jul/dez , pp. 273-313
210 views Abstract
2006
trajetórias tecnológicas em combustíveis sintéticos: análise dos mecanismos de seleção e indução
;Edmar Luiz Fagundes de Almeida;José Vitor Bomtempo;Fabrício Brollo Dunham
Vol. 5 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 99-129
168 views Abstract
2006
giovanni dosi - technological paradigms and technological trajectories
;David Rosenthal;Abraham Benzaquen Sicsú
Vol. 5 , No. 1 jan/jun , pp. 09-32
231 views
Journament Score
28.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,183 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

9.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.