mundo amazónico | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2971 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

mundo amazónico

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name mundo amazónico
Abbreviated Name mundo amazónico
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2010
Cross-Border Interactions and Health in the Brazil-Colombia-Peru Border Zone
Suárez-Mutis, Martha Cecilia;Cárdenas, Claudia Mercedes Mora;Reyes, Ligia del Pilar Perez;Peiter, Paulo Cesar;
Vol. 1 , pp. 243-266
399 views Abstract
2011
Ashéninka Ethnobotany, Between “Tradition” and “Modernity”: What does Plant Knowledge Mean?
Lenaerts, Marc;
Vol. 2 , pp. 67-94
312 views Abstract
2012
professores e dificuldades do ofício: preservação e reconstrução da dignidade profissional teachers and difficulties inherent to the job: preservation and (re)construction of professional dignity
;Françoise Lantheaume
Vol. 42 , No. 146 , pp. 368-387
290 views DOI Abstract
2010
a escola como microuniversidade na educação secundária em cuba the school as a mini-university in secondary education in cuba
;Maria do Carmo Luiz Caldas Leite
Vol. 40 , No. 139 , pp. 257-276
278 views DOI Abstract
2010
teoria do bem-estar das crianças the child welfare theory
;Leena Alanen
Vol. 40 , No. 141 , pp. 751-775
261 views DOI Abstract
2012
a reflexão sobre a prática na pesquisa e formação do professor de música the reflective practice in research and training of teachers of music
;Viviane Beineke
Vol. 42 , No. 145 , pp. 180-203
258 views DOI Abstract
2007
políticas e práticas de conciliação entre família e trabalho no brasil: issues and policies in brazil reconciling work and family
;Bila Sorj;Adriana Fontes;Danielle Carusi Machado
Vol. 37 , No. 132 , pp. 573-594
255 views DOI Abstract
2005
relações fecundas entre pesquisa e formação docente: elementos para um programa productive relationships between research and teacher: qualification elements for a program
;Marc Durand;Jacques Saury;Philippe Veyrunes
Vol. 35 , No. 125 , pp. 37-62
251 views DOI Abstract
2003
a contribuição de bernstein para a sociologia da educação
;Lucíola Licínio de C. P. Santos
, No. 120 , pp. 11-13
251 views DOI
2004
professoras de educação infantil e mudança: reflexões a partir de bakhtin primary education teaching professionals and change: reflections on bakhtin and beyond
;Sonia Kramer
Vol. 34 , No. 122 , pp. 497-515
247 views DOI Abstract
View All 32 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.