Indexed in Journament

proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part h, journal of engineering in medicine

ISSN 0954-4119· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,415 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
9 Articles
Scores higher than 91.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name proc inst mech eng h
Abbreviated Name proc inst mech eng h
ISSN 0954-4119

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 37.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 91.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 37.0 25.9
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 91.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2020
Carotid artery ultrasound image analysis: A review of the literature.
Latha, S;Samiappan, Dhanalakshmi;Kumar, R;
, pp. 954411919900720
446 views DOI Abstract
2013
Trabecular architecture analysis in femur radiographic images using fractals.
Udhayakumar, G;Sujatha, C M;Ramakrishnan, S;
Vol. 227 , No. 4 , pp. 448-53
416 views DOI Abstract
2020
Risk assessment in different Judo techniques for children and adolescent athletes
Vacca L;Rosso V;Gastaldi L;;
Vol. 234 , No. 7 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2019
What is the influence of two strain rates on the relationship between human cortical bone toughness and micro-structure?
Gauthier, Rémy;Follet, Hélène;Langer, Max;Peyrin, Françoise;Mitton, David;
, pp. 954411919884776
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of a fixed-grid and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods on modelling fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve.
Joda, Akram;Jin, Zhongmin;Summers, Jon;Korossis, Sotirios;
Vol. 233 , No. 5 , pp. 544-553
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Periprosthetic fracture morphology of a femoral neck prosthesis: An in vitro study.
Tsitlakidis, Stefanos;Vot, Leo;Westhauser, Fabian;Jaeger, Sebastian;Klotz, Matthias C;
, pp. 954411919877286
348 views DOI Abstract
2017
State of the art review on design and manufacture of hybrid biomedical materials: Hip and knee prostheses.
Bahraminasab, Marjan;Farahmand, Farzam;
Vol. 231 , No. 9 , pp. 785-813
327 views DOI Abstract
2005
The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks.
Eggbeer, D;Bibb, R;Williams, R;
Vol. 219 , No. 3 , pp. 195-202
321 views Abstract
2016
Strain gauge analysis of implant-supported, screw-retained metal frameworks: Comparison between different manufacturing technologies.
Degidi, Marco;Caligiana, Gianni;Francia, Daniela;Liverani, Alfredo;Olmi, Giorgio;Tornabene, Francesco;
Vol. 230 , No. 9 , pp. 840-846
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Risk assessment in different Judo techniques for children and adolescent athletes
Vacca L;Rosso V;Gastaldi L;;
Vol. 234 , No. 7 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2020
Carotid artery ultrasound image analysis: A review of the literature.
Latha, S;Samiappan, Dhanalakshmi;Kumar, R;
, pp. 954411919900720
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of a fixed-grid and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods on modelling fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve.
Joda, Akram;Jin, Zhongmin;Summers, Jon;Korossis, Sotirios;
Vol. 233 , No. 5 , pp. 544-553
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
What is the influence of two strain rates on the relationship between human cortical bone toughness and micro-structure?
Gauthier, Rémy;Follet, Hélène;Langer, Max;Peyrin, Françoise;Mitton, David;
, pp. 954411919884776
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Periprosthetic fracture morphology of a femoral neck prosthesis: An in vitro study.
Tsitlakidis, Stefanos;Vot, Leo;Westhauser, Fabian;Jaeger, Sebastian;Klotz, Matthias C;
, pp. 954411919877286
348 views DOI Abstract
2017
State of the art review on design and manufacture of hybrid biomedical materials: Hip and knee prostheses.
Bahraminasab, Marjan;Farahmand, Farzam;
Vol. 231 , No. 9 , pp. 785-813
327 views DOI Abstract
2016
Strain gauge analysis of implant-supported, screw-retained metal frameworks: Comparison between different manufacturing technologies.
Degidi, Marco;Caligiana, Gianni;Francia, Daniela;Liverani, Alfredo;Olmi, Giorgio;Tornabene, Francesco;
Vol. 230 , No. 9 , pp. 840-846
312 views DOI Abstract
2013
Trabecular architecture analysis in femur radiographic images using fractals.
Udhayakumar, G;Sujatha, C M;Ramakrishnan, S;
Vol. 227 , No. 4 , pp. 448-53
416 views DOI Abstract
2005
The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks.
Eggbeer, D;Bibb, R;Williams, R;
Vol. 219 , No. 3 , pp. 195-202
321 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,415 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

91.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.