Periprosthetic fracture morphology of a femoral neck prosthesis: An in vitro study.
Clicks: 343
ID: 51681
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
73.1
/100
343 views
239 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #6 of 9 articles by views in proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part h, journal of engineering in medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Femoral neck prostheses have been developed for the treatment of osteoarthritis in young and active patients. The concept combines a bone-conserving and minimal invasive technique with proximal load transferring by metaphyseal anchoring, which results in a more physiological loading pattern. However, little is known about the morphology of periprosthetic fractures. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe fracture patterns and to determine patient-specific factors favoring periprosthetic fracture. This study was performed as a biomechanical experimental study using 10 fresh frozen femora and 10 Silent-Hip femoral neck implants (DePuy International Ltd., Leeds, UK). In order to simulate physiological loading, a static muscle reconstruction (abductor muscles and iliotibial band) and a dynamic simulation of the gait cycle were applied. During biomechanical testing (50% and 100% of normal weight-bearing), three periprosthetic fractures with two different morphologies occurred. The first pattern corresponds to an abrupt breakaway. The second type was of spiral configuration extending to the diaphyseal region and emerging from an initial fissure. Specimen-specific factors favoring periprosthetic fracture were body mass index and varus angle of the implant. Periprosthetic fractures may extend to the subtrochanteric/diaphyseal region and may be of spiral configuration. According to the finding of this study, body mass index and varus/valgus position of the implant are important factors influencing the risk of periprosthetic fractures. Furthermore, partial weight-bearing as part of the postoperative regimen may be favorable.
| Reference Key |
tsitlakidis2019periprostheticproceedings
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tsitlakidis, Stefanos;Vot, Leo;Westhauser, Fabian;Jaeger, Sebastian;Klotz, Matthias C; |
| Journal | proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part h, journal of engineering in medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0954411919877286
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.