Indexed in Journament

Microbiology (Reading, England)

ISSN 1465-2080· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,201 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 72% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Microbiology (Reading)
Abbreviated Name microbiology (reading, engl)
ISSN 1465-2080
URL http://mic.sgmjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Microbiology (Reading, England)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 55.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.9 7.8
Content Distribution 53.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
Metabolic networks of the human gut microbiota.
444 views DOI Abstract
2018
The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mtf2 is required for mitochondrial cox1 gene expression.
Vol. 164 , No. 3 , pp. 400-409
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial activity of green silver nanoparticles from endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis procera (Ait) latex.
382 views DOI Abstract
2005
Comparison of Escherichia coli isolates implicated in human urinary tract infection and avian colibacillosis
Vol. 151 , No. Pt 6 , pp. -
340 views Abstract
2006
satisfacción en pacientes con reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo d.i.e.p. patient’s satisfaction after diep flap reconstruction
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 169-179
337 views Abstract
colgajo deltopectoral bilateral para el tratamiento de úlceras por radionecrosis en el cuello: caso clínico
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 219-223
335 views Abstract
2020
Siderophore piracy enhances environmental survival and pathogenesis.
Vol. 166 , No. 11 , pp. 1038-1046
276 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metabolic networks of the human gut microbiota.
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial activity of green silver nanoparticles from endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis procera (Ait) latex.
382 views DOI Abstract
2018
The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mtf2 is required for mitochondrial cox1 gene expression.
Vol. 164 , No. 3 , pp. 400-409
407 views DOI Abstract
2012
uso de esteroides sistémicos en quemaduras de segundo grado en modelo animal systemic steroid use in second degree burns in an animal model
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 153-156
193 views Abstract
2011
uso de terapia de vacío en el hospital infantil la fe de valencia (españa): experiencia y resultados experience and results with the use of vacuum assisted therapy at the children's hospital la fe, valencia (spain)
Vol. 37 , pp. S41-S52
162 views Abstract
2011
estudio preoperatorio de vasos receptores en reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo diep preoperative planning of receiver vessels in breast reconstruction with diep flap
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 233-238
185 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,201 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.