Journal of microbiological methods | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4753 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 месяц назад

Journal of microbiological methods

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Краткое название J Microbiol Methods
Сокращённое название j microbiol methods
ISSN 1872-8359
Цели и охват
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-microbiological-methods
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2003
Immunodetection of pneumolysin in human urine by ELISA
Cima-Cabal MD;Méndez FJ;Vázquez F;Aranaz C;Rodríguez-Alvarez J;García-García JM;Fleites A;Martínez González-Río J;Molinos L;de Miguel D;de los Toyos JR;;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. -
518 views Abstract
2016
A pipeline for developing and testing staining protocols for flow cytometry, demonstrated with SYBR Green I and propidium iodide viability staining.
Nescerecka, Alina;Hammes, Frederik;Juhna, Talis;
Vol. 131 , pp. 172-180
460 views DOI Abstract
2020
Smartphone-based lateral flow imaging system for detection of food-borne bacteria E.coli O157:H7.
Jung, Youngkee;Heo, Yoojung;Lee, Jae Joong;Deering, Amanda;Bae, Euiwon;
Vol. 168 , pp. 105800
404 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of panoral radiograph quality in a dental treatment center
;Hana Abdul-Wahab;Donald J Ferguson;Nadia Abou-Kheir
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 85-94
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
A fungal based synthesis method for copper nanoparticles with the determination of anticancer, antidiabetic and antibacterial activities.
Noor, Sadaf;Shah, Ziaullah;Javed, Aneela;Ali, Amjad;Hussain, Syed Bilal;Zafar, Sidra;Ali, Hazrat;Muhammad, Syed Aun;
, pp. 105966
344 views DOI Abstract
2006
Use of a spectrophotometric bioassay for determination of microbial sensitivity to manuka honey
Patton, Thomas;Barrett, John;Brennan, James;Moran, Noel
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 84-95
341 views
2019
How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer, Paula;Watrobska, Cecylia;Knowles, Sarah;Schroeder, Julia;Banks-Leite, Cristina;
Vol. 165 , pp. 105689
335 views DOI Abstract
2015
Development of a dry-reagent-based nucleic acid-sensing platform by coupling thermostabilised LATE-PCR assay to an oligonucleotide-modified lateral flow biosensor.
Ang, Geik Yong;Yu, Choo Yee;Chan, Kok Gan;Singh, Kirnpal Kaur Banga;Chan Yean, Yean;
Vol. 118 , pp. 99-105
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of microplate- and bottle-based methods to age yeast for chronological life span assays.
Kwong, Mandy Mun Yee;Lee, Jee Whu;Samian, Mohammed Razip;Watanabe, Nobumoto;Osada, Hiroyuki;Ong, Eugene Boon Beng;
, pp. 105743
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
A quantitative real time PCR assay to detect and enumerate Escherichia coli O157 and O26 serogroups in sheep recto-anal swabs.
Macori, Guerrino;McCarthy, Siobhán C;Burgess, Catherine M;Fanning, Séamus;Duffy, Geraldine;
, pp. 105703
297 views DOI Abstract
View All 37 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.