Indexed in Journament

Journal of microbiological methods

ISSN 1872-8359· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #4,450 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 84.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Microbiol Methods
Abbreviated Name j microbiol methods
ISSN 1872-8359
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-microbiological-methods

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 57.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 11.4 13.4
Content Distribution 57.4 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2003
Immunodetection of pneumolysin in human urine by ELISA
Cima-Cabal MD;Méndez FJ;Vázquez F;Aranaz C;Rodríguez-Alvarez J;García-García JM;Fleites A;Martínez González-Río J;Molinos L;de Miguel D;de los Toyos JR;;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. -
573 views Abstract
2016
A pipeline for developing and testing staining protocols for flow cytometry, demonstrated with SYBR Green I and propidium iodide viability staining.
Nescerecka, Alina;Hammes, Frederik;Juhna, Talis;
Vol. 131 , pp. 172-180
507 views DOI Abstract
2020
Smartphone-based lateral flow imaging system for detection of food-borne bacteria E.coli O157:H7.
Jung, Youngkee;Heo, Yoojung;Lee, Jae Joong;Deering, Amanda;Bae, Euiwon;
Vol. 168 , pp. 105800
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
A fungal based synthesis method for copper nanoparticles with the determination of anticancer, antidiabetic and antibacterial activities.
Noor, Sadaf;Shah, Ziaullah;Javed, Aneela;Ali, Amjad;Hussain, Syed Bilal;Zafar, Sidra;Ali, Hazrat;Muhammad, Syed Aun;
, pp. 105966
406 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of panoral radiograph quality in a dental treatment center
;Hana Abdul-Wahab;Donald J Ferguson;Nadia Abou-Kheir
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 85-94
400 views DOI Abstract
2015
Development of a dry-reagent-based nucleic acid-sensing platform by coupling thermostabilised LATE-PCR assay to an oligonucleotide-modified lateral flow biosensor.
Ang, Geik Yong;Yu, Choo Yee;Chan, Kok Gan;Singh, Kirnpal Kaur Banga;Chan Yean, Yean;
Vol. 118 , pp. 99-105
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer, Paula;Watrobska, Cecylia;Knowles, Sarah;Schroeder, Julia;Banks-Leite, Cristina;
Vol. 165 , pp. 105689
381 views DOI Abstract
2006
Use of a spectrophotometric bioassay for determination of microbial sensitivity to manuka honey
Patton, Thomas;Barrett, John;Brennan, James;Moran, Noel
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 84-95
381 views
2019
Comparison of microplate- and bottle-based methods to age yeast for chronological life span assays.
Kwong, Mandy Mun Yee;Lee, Jee Whu;Samian, Mohammed Razip;Watanabe, Nobumoto;Osada, Hiroyuki;Ong, Eugene Boon Beng;
, pp. 105743
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
A quantitative real time PCR assay to detect and enumerate Escherichia coli O157 and O26 serogroups in sheep recto-anal swabs.
Macori, Guerrino;McCarthy, Siobhán C;Burgess, Catherine M;Fanning, Séamus;Duffy, Geraldine;
, pp. 105703
329 views DOI Abstract
2025
Carcinoscorpius and Tachypleus lysates assay for detecting endotoxin in milk and groundwater: Toward reducing reliance on Limulus amebocyte lysate
Fauziyah,
Vol. 232-234 , pp. 0-0
27 views DOI
2022
Proficient mycogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles by soil derived fungus Aspergillus melleus SSS-10 with cytotoxic and antibacterial potency
Skanda, S.
Vol. 199 , pp. 0-0
23 views DOI
2021
Rapid cell counting and viability detection method of Escherichia coli Nissle using image cytometry.
Perry, Michele;McDonald, Mary;Lund, Anders;Nikrad, Mrinalini;Wong, Denise;Rice, William L;Chan, Leo Li-Ying;
, pp. 106381
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
A fungal based synthesis method for copper nanoparticles with the determination of anticancer, antidiabetic and antibacterial activities.
Noor, Sadaf;Shah, Ziaullah;Javed, Aneela;Ali, Amjad;Hussain, Syed Bilal;Zafar, Sidra;Ali, Hazrat;Muhammad, Syed Aun;
, pp. 105966
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-time PCR assay may be used to verify suspicious test results of Ureaplasmas spp. from the liquid culture method
Zhao, F.
Vol. 169 , pp. 0-0
180 views DOI
2020
Culture medium brand choice impacts colony swarming behavior among industrial Bacillus isolates and the accuracy of aerobic plate counts.
Gorsuch, John P;LeSaint, Daniel;Jones, Zachary;Bielecki, Korey;Woodruff, Peyton;
Vol. 172 , pp. 105891
242 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fluorescent microspheres as a positive indicator in an intratracheal infection model.
Leigh, S A;Branton, S L;Evans, J D;Collier, S D;
, pp. 105886
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
Smartphone-based lateral flow imaging system for detection of food-borne bacteria E.coli O157:H7.
Jung, Youngkee;Heo, Yoojung;Lee, Jae Joong;Deering, Amanda;Bae, Euiwon;
Vol. 168 , pp. 105800
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
In vitro evaluation of the decontamination effect of cold atmospheric argon plasma on selected bacteria frequently encountered in small animal bite injuries
Winter, S.
Vol. 169 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2020
Comparison of CapitalBio™ Mycobacterium nucleic acid detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis
Yu, G.
Vol. 168 , pp. 0-0
273 views DOI
Journament Score
42.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #4,450 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.