phytopathologia mediterranea | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2073 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

phytopathologia mediterranea

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name phytopathologia mediterranea
Abbreviated Name phytopathologia mediterranea
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2009
Volatile metabolites associated with one aflatoxigenic and one nontoxigenic <i>Aspergillus flavus </i>strain grown on two different substrates
Jurjevic, Z.;Rains, G.C.;Wilson, D.M.;Lewis, W.J.;
Vol. 47 , No. 3 , pp. 266-271
405 views Abstract
2010
design of a portable dual purposes water filter system
;MOHANAD EL-HARBAWI;AIDA AZWANA BT. SABIDI;EZZAH BT. KAMARUDIN;AMIRAN B. ABD HAMID;SUHAIZAL B. HARUN;AHMAD B. NAZLAN;CHIN XI YI
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 165-175
396 views Abstract
2011
Symptoms and fungi associated with esca in South African vineyards
WHITE, Chana-LEE;HALLEEN, Francois;MOSTERT, Lizel;
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 236-246
326 views Abstract
2013
mechanical property evaluation of a356/sicp/gr metal matrix composites
;B. M. VISWANATHA;M. PRASANNA KUMAR; S. BASAVARAJAPPA;T. S. KIRAN
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 754-763
307 views Abstract
2015
improvements in water supply systems based on optimization and recognition of consumption patterns
;A. M. F. DINIZ;C. H. O. FONTES;C. A. COSTA;A. M.S. FERREIRA;P. Í. D. SANTOS
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 571-590
304 views Abstract
2015
heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenol in aqueous suspension of periwinkle shell ash catalyst in the presence of uv from sunlight
;OSARUMWENSE, J. O.;AMENAGHAWON, N. A.;AISIEN, F. A.
Vol. 10 , No. 12 , pp. 1525-1539
301 views Abstract
2016
evaluating the reliability of pre-test differential equations questions using rasch measurement model
;N. LOHGHESWARY;Z. M. NOPIAH;E. ZAKARIA
Vol. 11 , No. Sp. Iss. on PEKA 2016 , pp. 31-39
299 views Abstract
2017
gas turbine power plant performance evaluation under key failures
;MANGEY RAM;KULDEEP NAGIYA
Vol. 12 , No. 7 , pp. 1871-1886
287 views Abstract
2016
circularly polarized slotted aperture antenna with coplanar waveguide fed for broadband applications
;B. T. P. MADHAV; HABIBULLA KHAN;SARAT K. KOTAMRAJU
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 262-277
250 views Abstract
2013
effect of convective boundary conditions at bottom wall on natural convections in a square cavity
;ASWATHA;C. J. GANGADHARA GOWDA;S. N. SRIDHARA;K. N. SEETHARAMU
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 141-164
249 views Abstract
View All 38 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.